Davis-Feliciano Neg

The Resolution is inherently unethical, even its renewable sustainable liberal impulses are unethical because it always already disavows the lost lives that are the condition of possibility for resolutional actors and action to exist. But the community doesn’t give two shits about these lives, about the Black trash that validates white existence because Blacks are never part of the community’s decision calculus on any resolutional question.     
Mills 1
[Charles, Professor of Uncut Dope at So Fly University, “Black Trash,” Faces of Environmental Racism: Confronting Issues of Global Justice, pages 73-74]   
"mainstream environmentalism is...body politic"

Ontological status of white subjectivity is founded on an objectification of Black bodies and non- human ecology that makes exploitation inevitable. White metaphysics will always seek to dominate what it deems as being the natural world because they are alienated from it.  
Cone 2k
(James H., Briggs Distinguished Professor at Union Theological Seminary, “Whose Earth Is It Anyway?”, Cross Currents, Spring/Summer, Vol. 50  Issue 1-2, http://web.archive.org/web/20110518031005/http://www.crosscurrents.org/cone.htm)
"expanding the ecological critique... but not for everyone's greed"

We reject the Resolutional Agent as unethical -
Wilderson ’10
[Frank, Assoc prof of African American Studies – Cal-Irvine, Red, White, & Black, pp 2-5]

In order for Justice to exist Justice has to mean more than Just-us. The world must be held accountable for its sins. Civil freedom is a pre-condition for natural freedom with the natural world, the industrialized landscape that is destroying the planet would not be possible were it not for modernity’s clearing of the land and the Anti-Black energy production pushed onto the Black transatlantic Slave. In order to reclaim the Earths integrity the land and space that we physically occupy must be liberated. Only liberating the landscape shaped by slavery and displacement can bring about true Justice and radical accountability.
Smith 7
(Kimberly K., Professor of Political Science and Environmental Studies, Carleton College, African American Environmental Thought: Foundations, p. 199)
"Nevertheless this tradition does offer... for human lives"

Neg vs. JMU MY @ Kentucky Rnd. 1

The Aff isn’t radical, just radically naïve – their claims to be so different from traditional practices only mask their codependent relationship with debate hierarchy – propping up the very system they claim to tear down, while seeking awards from the community they claim to stand apart from

Stroube 01 [Jack, www.ndtceda.com/archives/2001/10/0301.htm]

All of their impacts are non-unique and empiricaly denied – the only purpose served by their advocacy now is to prop up the systems of thought and argumentation they think they are railing against

Stroube 01 [Jack, www.ndtceda.com/archives/2001/11/2701.htm]

Disavowal of anti-black violence leaves the positionality of the slave unthought which disavows that Indigenous Americans were incorporated into a world formed by anti-blackness – blackness is ontologically foreclosed from the liminality of native existence

Woods 07 [Tryon, Human Architecture: Journal of the Sociology of Self-Knowledge, Summer, 319-330]

Churchill’s scholarship is flawed

Gossett 05 [Sherrie, “Churchill: Ward of the State,” www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1344737/posts]

Faulty scholarship turns their case – devastates activism and delegitimizes genocides

Brown 05 [Thomas, “The Genocide that Wasn’t” www.freerepublic.com/focus/fnews/1338607/posts]