General Actions:
Wiki: openCaselist
▼:
Document Index
»
Space: Vanderbilt
▼:
Document Index
»
Page: Williford-Stothers Aff
# | Date | Entry |
---|---|---|
09/22/2012 | GSU AFFTournament: | Round: | Opponent: | Judge: PlanThe United States Department of Energy should establish a matching funds program to develop and build a Liquid Fluoride Thorium Nuclear Reactor in its national labs.Advantage 1 – ProlifAdvantage 1 is ProlifNuclear renaissance is eminent – it’s the only viable electricity source worldwideMarketwire 12 – Part of the Paragon Report on uranium ore stock future [5/3/12, http://finance.yahoo.com/news/nuclear-renaissance-back-track-122000381.html]cs NEW YORK, NY--(Marketwire -05/03/12)- Last year AND ," Areva SA's Chief Commercial Officer Ruben Lazo said in a previous interview. The spread of nuclear power facilitates weapons development, triggering wildfire prolif and nuclear war – deterrence fails in the new international systemSokolski 9 – Henry, Executive Director – Nonproliferation Policy Education Center [Jul, “Avoiding a Nuclear Crowd”, Policy Review, June/July, http://www.hoover.org/publications/policyreview/46390537.html]cs Finally, several new nuclear weapons contenders are also likely to emerge in the next AND , would ever want. None of this, however, is inevitable. Prolif transforms existing conflicts into nuclear showdownsCimbala 8 – Professor of Political Science at Pennsylvania State University – Brandywine [Stephen J. Cimbala, “Anticipatory Attacks: Nuclear Crisis Stability in Future Asia,” Comparative Strategy, Volume 27, Issue 2 March 2008, pages 113 – 132Informaworld]gw The spread of nuclear weapons in Asia presents a complicated mosaic of possibilities in this AND could overturn these expectations for the obsolescence or marginalization of major interstate warfare. For theorists, the argument that thespread of nuclear weapons might be fully compatible with AND concepts might be inaccurate guides to the avoidance of war outside of Europe. Escalation will happen – inadequate crisis management, multipolarity enhances the risksEvans 9 – President of the International Crisis Group and Kawaguchi, Former Foreign Minister of Japan [Gareth Evans (Co-chair of the International Commission on Nuclear Non-proliferation and Disarmament and Professorial fellow in the School of Social and Political Sciences @ University of Melbourne) and Yoriko Kawaguchi (Co-chair of the International Commission on Nuclear Non-proliferation and Disarmament), “Eliminating Nuclear Threats: A Practical Agenda for Global Policymakers,” International Commission on Nuclear Non-proliferation and Disarmament Report, December 15, 2009, pg. http://www.icnnd.org/ reference/reports/ent/ downloads.html]gw 3.1 Ensuring that no new states join the ranks of those already nuclear AND enhanced fears of nuclear blackmail, and of irresponsible and unpredictable leadership behaviour. 3.2 In conditions of inadequate command and control systems, absence of confidence AND , historical – and for all those reasons, strongly emotive – dimensions. 3.3 The transitional period is likely to be most dangerous of all, AND fissile material coming into possession of non-state actors cannot be ignored. 3.4 The action–reaction cycle of nations on high alerts, of AND nuclear power centres divided by multiple and cross-cutting sources of conflict. Terrorists have the motive and capacity to build a bomb with civilian nuclear materialsBarnaby 9 – Frank, Emeritus Consultant to the Oxford Research Group [March, http://www.ippr.org/images/media/files/publication/2011/05/nuclear_renaissance_1679.pdf]gw There will also be a heightened risk that terrorists will acquire plutonium, fabricate a AND by terrorists to make nuclear explosives is an obvious threat to global security. Nuke terrorism triggers global nuclear war with Russia and ChinaAyson 10 – Robert, Professor of Strategic Studies and Director of the Centre for Strategic Studies: New Zealand at the Victoria University of Wellington [“After a Terrorist Nuclear Attack: Envisaging Catalytic Effects,” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, Volume 33, Issue 7, July, Available Online to Subscribing Institutions via InformaWorld]cn A terrorist nuclear attack, and even the use of nuclear weapons in response by AND for the terrorists. This might not help the chances of nuclear restraint. Thorium’s fuel cycle is self-sustaining based on U233 – all fissile material is contained within the reactorSorensen 12 – Kirk, Founder and Chief Technologist at Flibe Energy, Grad student in Nuclear Engineering, former Chief Nuclear Technologist at Teledyne Brown Engineering [8/4, http://www.peakprosperity.com/podcast/79398/kirk-sorensen-detailed-exploration-thoriums-potential-energy-source]gw Kirk Sorenson: Those are the best questions. The way thorium is used – AND neutrons to make new U233 from thorium – all U233 comes from thorium. That substantially reduces the spread of fissile materialSorensen 12 – Kirk, Founder and Chief Technologist at Flibe Energy, Grad student in Nuclear Engineering, former Chief Nuclear Technologist at Teledyne Brown Engineering [July, “Response to Oliver Tickell’s Anti-Thorium Article” http://energyfromthorium.com/tickell-rebuttal-jul-2012/]gw LFTR’s end-to-end fuel cycle offers greatly reduced proliferation risks in large AND amenable to vitrification in an inert glassy form for long-term storage. U233 can’t be used in weapons or be removed from the reactor – LFTRs also consume old fissile material and obviate the need for uranium enrichment facilitiesHargraves 10 – Robert, teaches Energy Policy at the Institute for Lifelong Education at Dartmouth College, PhD in physics from Brown University, and Ralph Moir, published ten papers on molten salt reactors during his career at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, ScD in nuclear engineering from MIT [American Scientist98. 5 (Sep/Oct 2010): 364-365]gw A commercial reactor will make just enough uranium to sustain power generation. Diverting any AND can increase prosperity and can reduce the potential for wars over resource competition. The plan revives US nuclear leadership – that’s key to strengthen international non-prolif initiativesMiller 12 – Warren “Pete” Miller, Ph.D., Co-chair, Bipartisan Policy Center Nuclear Initiative and Former Assistant Secretary for Nuclear Energy [July, http://bipartisanpolicy.org/sites/default/files/Leadership%20in%20Nuclear%20Energy%20Markets.pdf]gw Strategic Goal: Continued strong U.S. leadership in global nuclear security matters AND framed commerce and security not as competing objectives but as “inextricably intertwined.” Advantage 2 – WarmingAdvantage 2 is WarmingOverwhelming scientific consensus indicates warming is accelerating and anthropogenicPearce 7 – Fred, environment consultant for New Scientist [With speed and violence: why scientists fear tipping points in climate change, GoogleBooks, pp. 10-17]cn First, the basic physics. As we have seen, much of this goes AND ? Some of them can be heard making the case against climate change. The impact is extinctionHeinberg 7 – Richard, Senior Fellow at Post Carbon Institute, recipient of the Award for Excellence and Energy Education [Peak Everything, p. 19-22]cn First, some problems are more critical than others. A patient may suffer simultaneously AND community involvement, intergenerational solidarity, and the other intangible goods listed earlier. Warming turns and magnifies their impactsBurke 8 – Sharon, Senior Fellow and Director of the Energy Security Project at the Center for New American Security [Climatic Cataclysm: The Foreign Policy and National Security Implications of Climate Change, GoogleBooks, pp. 157-161]cn At the same time, however, the implications of both trends for human society AND , Central America, the Caribbean, South America, and Southeast Asia. LFTRs solve – they’re cost-competitive and replace current sources of energyHargraves 11 – Robert, teaches Energy Policy at the Institute for Lifelong Education at Dartmouth College, PhD in physics from Brown University, and Ralph Moir, published ten papers on molten salt reactors during his career at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, ScD in nuclear engineering from MIT [Jan, http://www.naturals.ukpc.net/TR/Hansen/liq1.pdf]gw Burning coal for power is the largest source of atmospheric CO2 , which drives global AND , ending 10 billion tons per year of CO2 emissions from coal plants. LFTRs substantially cut emissions and reverse warming trendsHargraves 12 – Robert, teaches Energy Policy at the Institute for Lifelong Education at Dartmouth College, PhD in physics from Brown University [July, “THORIUM energy cheaper than coal”]gw Taiwan's Taichung 4-4 GW coal power plant is the world's largest. The AND ocean C02 absorption and acidification, harmful to sea life and food supplies. U.S. clean energy development key to global spilloverRoberts 4 – Paul, journalist, author, energy expert and writer for Harpers [The End of Oil, pg. 325-6]cn Politically, a new U.S. energy policy would send a powerful message AND business prospects in China that it now has its own vehicles in Beijing.” [Competition spurs faster innovation – that’s key][Explicit a2 50/85]SolvencyGovernment support for private initiatives is key to rapid development – matching funds programs generate massive investment in LFTRsMartin 12 – Award-winning science and technology journalist, editorial director for Pike Research [Richard Martin, Award-winning science and technology journalist and editorial director for Pike Research, SuperFuel: Thorium, the Green Energy Source for the Future, May 2012. (p. 232)](NSB) WHILE A NEW MANHATTAN PROJECT is not going to happen, some form of government AND for a total of $ 4 billion to $ 10 billion a year. A successful RandD project will spur commercialization by corporationsHargraves 12 – Robert, teaches Energy Policy at the Institute for Lifelong Education at Dartmouth College, PhD in physics from Brown University [July, “THORIUM energy cheaper than coal”]gw Governments have an opportunity to incentivize corporations to undertake LFTR research and development. Once AND emitting energy from coal and reduce demand for energy from other fossil fuels. The use of national labs solve any tech barriers – giving businesses access to them is key to LFTR developmentHargraves 12 – Robert, teaches Energy Policy at the Institute for Lifelong Education at Dartmouth College, PhD in physics from Brown University [July, “THORIUM energy cheaper than coal”]gw US National Laboratories are capable of developing LFTR. The US has many national laboratories AND step in to lead development, as is happening in China and France. Advanced tech ensures LFTR development can be streamlinedHargraves 12 – Robert, teaches Energy Policy at the Institute for Lifelong Education at Dartmouth College, PhD in physics from Brown University [July, “THORIUM energy cheaper than coal”]gw Shorter projects cost less and have less cancellation risk. I recommend a high priority AND -based electric power plant was built at Shippingport PA in 39 months. LFTRs are technologically feasible – the science is provenSorensen 12 – Kirk, Founder and Chief Technologist at Flibe Energy, Grad student in Nuclear Engineering, former Chief Nuclear Technologist at Teledyne Brown Engineering [July, “Response to Oliver Tickell’s Anti-Thorium Article” http://energyfromthorium.com/tickell-rebuttal-jul-2012/]gw The primary uncertainty is bureaucratic, not technical. The fundamental physics, operation, AND fluid molten-salt reactor power station” such as the modern LFTR. Public-private partnerships are successful at developing new tech and facilitating commercializationYin 12 – Clifton, Clean Energy Policy Analyst at the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, Masters in Public Policy with a focus on environmental and regulatory policy from the Georgetown Public Policy Institute [7/31, http://theenergycollective.com/cliftonyin/98391/carbon-fiber-government-clean-tech-innovation-success-story]gw Carbon fiber composites have been employed in racecars, sporting goods, and the aerospace AND , and nuclear power in the pantheon of government technology innovation success stories. | |
02/02/2013 | Georgia 1ACTournament: | Round: | Opponent: | Judge: PlanThe United States federal government should establish a matching funds program to develop and build a Liquid Fluoride Thorium Nuclear Reactor in its National Laboratories.Advantage 1 – ProlifAdvantage 1 is ProlifNuclear renaissance is coming nowTBI 12 – The Breakthrough Institute, think tank focused on innovation-centered approaches to national and global energy and climate challenges The spread of nuclear power facilitates weapons development, triggering wildfire prolif and nuclear war – deterrence fails in the new international systemSokolski 9 – Henry, Executive Director – Nonproliferation Policy Education Center Multipolarity and inadequate crisis management ensure escalationEvans 9 – President of the International Crisis Group %26 Kawaguchi, Former Foreign Minister of Japan Terrorists have the motive and capacity to build a bomb with civilian nuclear materialsBarnaby 9 – Frank, Emeritus Consultant to the Oxford Research Group Nuke terrorism triggers global nuclear war with Russia and ChinaAyson 10 – Robert, Professor of Strategic Studies and Director of the Centre for Strategic Studies: New Zealand at the Victoria University of Wellington Thorium’s fuel cycle is self-sustaining based on U233 – all fissile material is contained within the reactorSorensen 12 – Kirk, Founder and Chief Technologist at Flibe Energy, Grad student in Nuclear Engineering, former Chief Nuclear Technologist at Teledyne Brown Engineering That substantially reduces the spread of fissile materialSorensen 12 – Kirk, Founder and Chief Technologist at Flibe Energy, Grad student in Nuclear Engineering, former Chief Nuclear Technologist at Teledyne Brown Engineering Their authors are wrong – thorium is prolif resistantHargraves 10 – Robert, teaches Energy Policy at the Institute for Lifelong Education at Dartmouth College, PhD in physics from Brown University, and Ralph Moir, published ten papers on molten salt reactors during his career at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, ScD in nuclear engineering from MIT The plan revives US nuclear leadership – that’s key to strengthen international non-prolif initiativesMiller 12 – Warren "Pete" Miller, Ph.D., Co-chair, Bipartisan Policy Center Nuclear Initiative and Former Assistant Secretary for Nuclear Energy Advantage 2 – WarmingAdvantage 2 is WarmingWarming is real and anthropogenicProthero 12 – Donald, Professor of Geology at Occidental College and Geobiology at California Institute of Technology Warming makes all impacts inevitable and causes extinctionBurke 8 – Sharon, Senior Fellow and Director of the Energy Security Project at the Center for New American Security LFTRs solve – they’re cost-competitive and replace current sources of energyHargraves 11 – Robert, teaches Energy Policy at the Institute for Lifelong Education at Dartmouth College, PhD in physics from Brown University, and Ralph Moir, published ten papers on molten salt reactors during his career at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, ScD in nuclear engineering from MIT LFTRs substantially cut emissions and reverse warming trendsHargraves 12 – Robert, teaches Energy Policy at the Institute for Lifelong Education at Dartmouth College, PhD in physics from Brown University U.S. clean energy development key to global spilloverRoberts 4 – Paul, journalist, author, energy expert and writer for Harpers Advantage 3 – WaterAdvantage 3 is waterNuclear solves water warsPalley 11 – Reese Thorium is keyHalper 12 – Mark, contributing editor, energy, Smart Planet It’s economically viableSeneviratne 7 – Gamini Seneviratne 7, Nuclear News’s Vienna Correspondent Water wars go globalReilly 2 – Kristie, Editor for In These Times, a nonprofit, independent, national magazine published in Chicago, *Cites environmental thinker and activist Vandana Shiva Maude Barlow and Tony Clarke—probably North America’s foremost water experts Water scarcity causes Central Asian warPriyadarshi 12 – Nitish, lecturer in the department of environment and water management at Ranchi University in India ExtinctionBlank 2k – Stephen J, Expert on the Soviet Bloc for the Strategic Studies Institute SolvencySolvencyGovernment support for private initiatives is key to rapid development – matching funds programs generate massive investment in LFTRsMartin 12 – Award-winning science and technology journalist, editorial director for Pike Research A successful R%26D project will spur commercialization by corporationsHargraves 12 – Robert, teaches Energy Policy at the Institute for Lifelong Education at Dartmouth College, PhD in physics from Brown University The use of national labs solve any tech barriers – giving businesses access to them is key to LFTR developmentHargraves 12 – Robert, teaches Energy Policy at the Institute for Lifelong Education at Dartmouth College, PhD in physics from Brown University Advanced tech ensures LFTR development can be streamlinedHargraves 12 – Robert, teaches Energy Policy at the Institute for Lifelong Education at Dartmouth College, PhD in physics from Brown University LFTRs are technologically feasible – the science is provenSorensen 12 – Kirk, Founder and Chief Technologist at Flibe Energy, Grad student in Nuclear Engineering, former Chief Nuclear Technologist at Teledyne Brown Engineering Public-private partnerships are successful at developing new tech and facilitating commercializationYin 12 – Clifton, Clean Energy Policy Analyst at the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, Masters in Public Policy with a focus on environmental and regulatory policy from the Georgetown Public Policy Institute | |
02/03/2013 | Georgia Octas - 2ACTournament: Georgia | Round: Octas | Opponent: Emory DH | Judge: Atchison, Murray, Swanlek ProlifNuclear weapons catalyze conventional war Rather, the presence of nuclear weapons may make policy-makers more sanguine about WarmingMost recent studies conclude warming now A2: R%26D – 2ACWe Meet – The plan leads directly to the construction of working reactors – it’s also production A2: States CP – 2AC FrontlinesPerm: Do Both – shields the link – backlash will be focused at the most local actor, and total consensus means opponents think it’s hopeless SMRs CPPerm do both Links to politics – all of their reasons why the plan is unpopular link to conventional SMRs Immigration 2ACAff solves motivation for terror attack A2: Kazakhstan Uranium DA – 2ACWater makes this conflict inevitable | |
02/03/2013 | Georgia Octas - 1ARTournament: Georgia | Round: Octas | Opponent: Emory DH | Judge: Atchison, Murray, Swanlek Prolif escalatesProlif transforms existing conflicts into nuclear showdowns Conventional WarNuclear weapons increase the chance for conventional war BiowepsOrganisms won’t survive delivery A2: Deterrence Prevents AttacksDeterrence won’t prevent terrorism A2: Kazakhstan Uranium DA – Economy Diversifying 1ARFinish this card — Kazakh diversifying economy now A2: Kazakhstan Uranium DA – A2: Central Asian War 1AR2AC Weitz ev says that major players have no strategic interest in being drawn into a Central Asian war – resource dependence checks – means wars are small and contained Central Asian War – No Escalation EXTNo superpower has vital interests at stake in Cental Asia | |
03/09/2013 | TNW AffTournament: ADA Nats | Round: 4 | Opponent: Liberty EF | Judge: Weiner, Jake PlanTerrorismAdvantage 1 is Terrorism RelationsAdvantage 2 is US-Russian Relations SolvencySolvency Plan: The United States Executive Branch should substantially increase financial incentives for the procurement of tactical nuclear weapons from Russia for the sole purpose of nuclear energy production in the United States |
Tournament | Round | Report |
---|
Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete? |
---|
Air Force
Amherst
Appalachian State
Arizona State
Army
Augustana
Bard
Baylor
Binghamton
Boston College
CSU Northridge
CSU Sacramento
CUNY
Cal Berkeley
Cal Lutheran
Cal Poly SLO
Case Western
Central Florida
Central Oklahoma
Chico
Clarion
Columbia
Concordia
Cornell
Dartmouth
Denver
Drexel-Swarthmore
ENMU
East Los Angeles College
Eastern Washington
Emory
Emporia
Fayetteville State
Florida
Florida Int'l
Florida State
Fordham
Fort Hays
Fresno State
Fullerton
Gainesville State
George Mason
George Washington
Georgetown
Georgia
Georgia State
Georgia Tech
Gonzaga
Harvard
Houston
Idaho State
Illinois
Illinois State
Indiana
Iowa
James Madison
John Carroll
Johns Hopkins
Johnson County CC
KCKCC
Kansas
Kansas State
Kentucky
LA City College
Lafayette
Lewis-Clark State College
Liberty
Lindenwood
Los Rios
Louisiana-Lafayette
Louisville
Loyola
Macalester
Marist
Mary Washington
Mercer
Methodist
Miami FL
Miami OH
Michigan
Michigan State
Minnesota
Mission
Missouri State
NYU
Navy
New School
North Texas
Northern Iowa
Northwestern
Notre Dame
Ohio Wesleyan
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pepperdine
Piedmont
Pittsburgh
Portland State
Princeton
Puget Sound
Redlands
Richmond
Rochester
Rutgers
Samford
San Diego State
San Francisco State
Santa Clara
South Florida St Pete
Southern Methodist
Southwestern
Stanford
Texas State
Texas-Austin
Texas-Dallas
Texas-San Antonio
Texas-Tyler
Towson
Trinity
UCLA
UDC-CC
UMKC
UNLV
USC
Utah
Vanderbilt
Vermont
Virginia Tech
Wake Forest
Washington
Wayne State
Weber
West Georgia
West Virginia
Western Connecticut
Whitman
Wichita State
Wisconsin Oshkosh
Wyoming