General Actions:
# | Date | Entry |
---|---|---|
09/23/2012 | Heidegger KTournament: GSU | Round: | Opponent: | Judge: LinksThe 1AC places a fascist restriction on human agency – we are barred from interacting with the world as anything but calculative machines.McWhorter 92 (Ladelle, Professor of Philosophy and Women's Studies at Richmond, Heidegger and the earth: Essays in environmental philosophy, Thomas Jefferson University Press, pp. 6) But through its static, all-knowing mode, it conceals other truths. What about the other ways, the other solutions? The affirmative isolates problems from the natural world, never allowing them to be evaluated in their full and assumes that humanity has the power to control everything, creating the perception of the natural as a resource for human manipulation.McWhorter 92 (Ladelle, Heidegger and the Earth Essays in Environmental Philosophy, Thomas Jefferson University Press, pg. viii) Nuclear technology is the archetype and culmination of western metaphysical tradition and enframing of life worldKinsella 2007 (William J, Heidegger and Being at the Hanford Reservation: Standing Reserve, Enframing, and Environmental Communication Theory; Environmental Communication Vol. 1, No. 2, November 2007, pp.194-217 Dr. William J. Kinsella is an associate professor at North Carolina State University. His work on nuclear energy communication has encompassed the areas of nuclear fusion, environmental cleanup across the US nuclear weapons complex, and commercial nuclear energy in US and global contexts.) Alternative energy projects force nature to conform to human uses and desires. Nature becomes a standing resource to be exploited for human means and loses its authentic meaning.Antolick 2 (Matthew, Master of Arts Department of Philosophy University of South Florida, "Deep Ecology and Heideggerian Phenomenology," http://etd.fcla.edu/SF/SFE0000104/antolick.pdf) The aff's quest for energy is a literal manifestation of the standing reserveTad Beckman, Professor at Harvey Mudd College, Martin Heidegger and Environmental Ethics, 2000Heidegger clearly saw the development of "energy resources" as symbolic of this evolutionary We need to be more aware of our limits, not try to overcome them or the environmental crisis will only continue to intensify. Ecological concerns have erupted in postmodern times largely as a result of the increasingly apparent The 1AC relation to the environment continues the drive for control and domination of the planet as all wildlife is reduced to a calculative value within the context of human action. This reduces all beings to objects and renders humanity a mere resource to be consumed.DeLuca 05 (Kevin Micheal, prof of comm and ecology @ U of Georgia) Thinking with Heidegger: Rethinking Environmental Theory and Practice Ethics %26 the Environment 10.1 (2005) 67-87) The affirmatives has become tied up in the task of developing the technological world which creates the process of enframing the world in Heidegger's term of "standing reserve" – enframing the world in terms of manipulation and a managerial approachRosemann 02 ~[Philipp, Assistant Professor of Philosophy at the University of Dallas, Journal of the History of Philosophy 40.4, "Heidegger's Trancendental History", 2002, SM, Accessed: 6/28/11~] Advocating this energy policy necessarily frames nature through this technological lens. It has solely become an isolated end through the anthropocentric means of energy. This ideology diminishes the value of nature into just another tool in the shed to be exploited.Spicer 2 (André, Associate Professor of Organisation Studies at Warwick Business School, "Technical Questions: A Review of Key Works on the Question Of Technology," Ephemera: critical dialogues in organization, Vol 2, Issues 1, 64-83, http://www.ephemeraweb.org/journal/2-1/2-1spicer.pdf-http://www.ephemeraweb.org/journal/2-1/2-1spicer.pdf) ImpactsMcWhorter 92 (Professor of philosophy at Northeast Missouri State, 92. LaDelle, Heidegger and the Earth, ed: McWhorter, p. 15-16) Ontological damnation outweighs nuclear war. A slow motion nuclear war is happening now as we devour the earth and life has no meaning in their framework.Zimmerman, (Professor of Philosophy at Tulane), 94 (Michael, Contesting the Earth's Future, p. Enframing reduces nature's value to raw materials – this is the root cause of the environmental crisis.Rohkrämer, 05 – History and Philosophy professor at Lancaster University (Thomas, How Green Were the Nazis: Martin Heidegger, National Socialism, and Environmentalism, p. 189) Why did Heidegger see "enframing" as the greatest danger? Heidegger's main concern Technological enframing of the world is the root cause of destruction of nature.DeLuca '5 (Kevin Michael DeLuca, Associate Professor of Speech Communication and adjunct in the Institute of Ecology at the University of Georgia, "Thinking With Heidegger: Rethinking Environmental Theory and Practice", Ethics %26 the Environment 10.1 (2005) 67-87, Project Muse)JRC—no change Machination is unconditional controllability, the domination of all beings, the world, and Politics that fails to question our consumption of resources and manipulation of the planet will cause nihilistic destruction of the planet.de Beistegui, 97 – Professor of Philosophy at the University of Warwick (Miguel, Heidegger and the Political, ed. by K. Ansell-Pearson and S. Critchely, p.71, ASG)JRC What monstrousness does Heidegger have in mind here? In what sense can technology be AlternativeOur desperate desire for constant action to seize control of a world is the very trait we must abandon if we are to progress as a people. Thus, we do not present a specific action in favor of questioning reflection. Our thought need not be the precursor to action – it itself is active, revealing the cycle of destruction hidden by the 1AC. The only way to understand competing claims is to first understand being Tad Beckman, Professor at Harvey Mudd College, Martin Heidegger and Environmental Ethics, 2000When we explore beings, things that exist, we discover that most beings are The root cause of their harms is viewing the world as standing reserve. Suspending our urge to manage gives us a chance re-connect with ontology and break-free from this technological enframing.Best and Nocella, 06 –associate professor of philosophy at the University of Texas at El Paso (Igniting a Revolution: Voices in Defense of the Earth, p. 82-84, google books) Yet, for both Heidegger and revolutionary environmentalists, there exist possibilities for transformation despite The argument that there's no alternative is a link—it ignores the constructed nature of sovereignty and assumes its natural—this forecloses any possibility of resistanceShaw, (Professor of Poli Sci, University of Victoria), 99 (Karena, 9 Transnational Law %26 Contemporary Problems 569, lexis). The dangers of assuming sovereignty emerge from the ways in which the assumption of | |
09/23/2012 | DOE Trade-off DATournament: GSU | Round: | Opponent: | Judge: DOE is currently having success in the advanced bio-fuels development, but there is still work to be doneBlake 12 – Cary, associate editor of Western Farm Press and agricultural journalist The EERE receives biggest hit under the proposed House Republican budget, proves budget will be tightWang 12 – Herman, associate editor at Platts Republicans and special interest groups are looking to put all biofuel programs on the chopping block, your plan would push biofuels to the chopping blockBowen 12 – Robert, former Colorado legislator, appointed member of various boards and commissions, and journalist focusing on energy policy Rising costs to buy and protect oil endangers Navy and leads to decreased national security, bio-fuels solveAgg 11 – Jay, National Communication Director for American Vets Naval power independently solves great power warsConway et all 7 - James T., General, U.S. Marine Corps, Gary Roughead, Admiral, U.S. Navy, Thad W. Allen, Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard | |
09/23/2012 | Ethics DATournament: GSU | Round: | Opponent: | Judge: 1NC SHELLGovernment spending is forced labor – it’s a direct violation of self-ownershipNozick 74 – Robert, Professor of Philosophy at Harvard You have an a priori obligation to reject this violation of self-ownership – this comes before their consequentialist impactsHoppe 93 – Hans-Hermann, Professor of Economics at UNLV |
Tournament | Round | Report |
---|
Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete? |
---|
Air Force
Amherst
Appalachian State
Arizona State
Army
Augustana
Bard
Baylor
Binghamton
Boston College
CSU Northridge
CSU Sacramento
CUNY
Cal Berkeley
Cal Lutheran
Cal Poly SLO
Case Western
Central Florida
Central Oklahoma
Chico
Clarion
Columbia
Concordia
Cornell
Dartmouth
Denver
Drexel-Swarthmore
ENMU
East Los Angeles College
Eastern Washington
Emory
Emporia
Fayetteville State
Florida
Florida Int'l
Florida State
Fordham
Fort Hays
Fresno State
Fullerton
Gainesville State
George Mason
George Washington
Georgetown
Georgia
Georgia State
Georgia Tech
Gonzaga
Harvard
Houston
Idaho State
Illinois
Illinois State
Indiana
Iowa
James Madison
John Carroll
Johns Hopkins
Johnson County CC
KCKCC
Kansas
Kansas State
Kentucky
LA City College
Lafayette
Lewis-Clark State College
Liberty
Lindenwood
Los Rios
Louisiana-Lafayette
Louisville
Loyola
Macalester
Marist
Mary Washington
Mercer
Methodist
Miami FL
Miami OH
Michigan
Michigan State
Minnesota
Mission
Missouri State
NYU
Navy
New School
North Texas
Northern Iowa
Northwestern
Notre Dame
Ohio Wesleyan
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pepperdine
Piedmont
Pittsburgh
Portland State
Princeton
Puget Sound
Redlands
Richmond
Rochester
Rutgers
Samford
San Diego State
San Francisco State
Santa Clara
South Florida St Pete
Southern Methodist
Southwestern
Stanford
Texas State
Texas-Austin
Texas-Dallas
Texas-San Antonio
Texas-Tyler
Towson
Trinity
UCLA
UDC-CC
UMKC
UNLV
USC
Utah
Vanderbilt
Vermont
Virginia Tech
Wake Forest
Washington
Wayne State
Weber
West Georgia
West Virginia
Western Connecticut
Whitman
Wichita State
Wisconsin Oshkosh
Wyoming