Tournament: | Round: | Opponent: | Judge:
This is INTERNAL KRITIK, sometimes known as “immanent criticism.”
We take inspiration from Jones’s description – Not:
themes nor straightforwardly...previously gone unrecognized
She continues in 2011:
Jones 2011 Emma, Dr Phil at U Oregon, SPEAKING AT THE LIMIT: THE ONTOLOGY OF LUCE IRIGARAY’S ETHICS, IN DIALOGUE WITH LACAN AND HEIDEGGER
Irigaray’s texts, according ... two different subjects” (JLI: 3).
4 Points of method.
METHOD POINT ONE: “asks not what discourses say but what they do, not as bodies of truth, but as institutionally produced and supervised practices” That’s Jones 2000
METHOD POINT TWO: Inconsistencies are a DOUBLE EDGED SWORD.
Writing in the context of feminism, Jones notes: , “contradiction, tension and instability sustain phallocentric accounts.’
Undoing dominant paradigms is thus not a blanket celebration of inconsistency.
Rather, Jones says we must: “mobilize instabilities” that have “become productive, rather than celebrated for its own sake”
…
intervening in the history of philosophy so as to “open it up to its own lacks and inadequacies, not as a source of weakness, but as a site for its growth and development”
She continues in 2000…
Rachel, Phil at U Dundee, Hypatia 15.2: 151-158
Blindspots and elisions,... French women philosophers.
METHOD POINT THREE: Does the 1AC reckon with its inconsistencies?—AKA, the links…
They inscribe subjective divides into the heart of their politics, by creating a background upon which they operate upon by IGNORING OBJECTS
Bryant 10 Levi, Professor of Philosophy at Collin College, Hominind Ecology, http://larvalsubjects.wordpress.com/2012/05/10/hominid-ecology/#more-6121
From this moment forward…time to begin changing that.
But this imperative is lost amidst their BIG STICK impact calculus.
Perhaps the concrete political struggles of plan recipients are not enough to justify the 1AC?
Martin Leet writes:
But the romantic ... work of politics?
Leet continues in 2006 Senior Research at the Brisbane Institute; with Roland Bleiker “From the Sublime to the Subliminal: Fear, Awe and Wonder in International Politics” Millennium v 34
Thus, by means ... need for justification.
METHOD POINT 4: Voting negative discerns the divisions within their project, welcoming the 1AC by setting aside its claims to solve its terminal impact.
Instead of judging them against an external standard, we test the 1AC against itself.
Pavlich notes kritik’s Etymology Opens Up to:
to judge, but also separate, discern, discriminate, select, dif- ferentiate and decide.” *(2005)
He continues:
George Pavlich 2000
Dept Sociology at University of Alberta, “NIETZSCHE, CRITIQUE AND THE PROMISE OF NOT BEING THUS . . .”International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 13: 357–375, 2000
One question: what ... all the better’.35