Tournament:  | Round:  | Opponent:  | Judge:
The current moral conception of Nature is one that appeals to transcendent value which places the benchmark of humanity’s virtue upon a perfect ordered view of nature which exists only within fantasy. This moral narrative is ultimately self-defeating and can only view the world we actually live in as ugly. This view ultimately proclaims itself to be the only universal value and not only is self-defeating, but crowds out all other values.

Cronon 95, President of the American Society for Environmental History; “Vilus” Research Professor at UW-Madison, the university’s most distinguished chaired professorship. He has been elected President of the American Historical Association for 2011-12.; .A. (1979), M.Phil. (1980), and Ph.D. (1990) from Yale, and a D.Phil. (1981) from Oxford University. Cronon has been a Rhodes Scholar, Danforth Fellow, Guggenheim Fellow, and MacArthur Fellow; has won prizes for his teaching at both Yale and Wisconsin; in 1999 was elected a member of the American Philosophical Society (William Cronon, ed., “The Trouble with Wilderness; or, Getting Back to the Wrong Nature” Uncommon Ground: Rethinking the Human Place in Nature, New York: W. W. Norton and Co., 1995, 69-90 JTC

Thus it is …make our homes.

This is exemplified in the National Park

Cronon 95, President of the American Society for Environmental History; “Vilus” Research Professor at UW-Madison, the university’s most distinguished chaired professorship. He has been elected President of the American Historical Association for 2011-12.; .A. (1979), M.Phil. (1980), and Ph.D. (1990) from Yale, and a D.Phil. (1981) from Oxford University. Cronon has been a Rhodes Scholar, Danforth Fellow, Guggenheim Fellow, and MacArthur Fellow; has won prizes for his teaching at both Yale and Wisconsin; in 1999 was elected a member of the American Philosophical Society (William Cronon, ed., “The Trouble with Wilderness; or, Getting Back to the Wrong Nature” Uncommon Ground: Rethinking the Human Place in Nature, New York: W. W. Norton and Co., 1995, 69-90 JTC

But by the … be an American.

But despite placing these meanings upon it we fail to recognize that there can only be the Will to Power—This understanding of the world recognizes that values are not metaphysical, it is only when the will to power is recognized can the process of questioning values creatively begin.

Aydin 07, Ciano (lecturer in philosophy at Radbound University).  “Nietzsche on Reality as Will to Power: Toward and 'Organization-Struggle' Model.”  The Journal of Nietzsche Studies 33.  Spring 2007.

We can begin …always remain possible.

Moralistic interpretations over nature arose from the inherent limit upon our knowledge over value, the truths that we have constructed about nature serve only as an effacement of nature’s inability to be appropriated by morality.

Drenthen 05, Martin, Philosophy and Science Studies U. Nijmegen (“Wildness as a Critical Border Concept: Nietzsche and the Debate on Wilderness Restoration,” Environmental Values, Volume 14, Number 3) JTC

Underneath Nietzscheʼs critique … with wild ¶ nature. ¶

That means our moral interpretations  are a symptom of a violent Will to Order which are based against the world as it exists. This constant disavowal of the unordered world misaligned with our explanatory models breeds Ressentiment, and causes the tragedy we seek to purge

Saurette 1996

 (Paul, Prof of Political Studies @ UOttawa, “I Mistrust All Systematizers and Avoid Them: Nietzsche, Arendt, and the Crisis of the Will to Order in International Relations Theory” Millenium 25.1)

According to Nietzsche… principle of modernity.

This is a part of a larger trend of values based in transcendence today—the highest values devalue thesmelves

Brown 01, Wendy , Political Theory @ UC Berkeley, 2k1

(Politics Out of History. P 23-24

From this account, … righteous political principle.

Thus: The United States Federal Government should remove restrictions on topical energy production in “National Parks”

Our critique doesn’t only apply to the moralism of long ago, tyrants of the spirit seek to produce a once-and-for-all interpretation of what it means to be resulting in a denigration of individuals to sameness and an impetus for oppression   

Strong, 08 [Tracy B, Ph.D. from Harvard, Professor of political science at UC-San Diego, “Nietzsche and the Political: Tyranny, Tragedy, Cultural Revolution, and Democracy." The Journal of Nietzsche Studies 35,http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/journal_of_nietzsche_studies/v035/35.strong.html]]

Nietzsche in fact … a mortal peril” (D 9).

We should say “Yes” to the affirmative, the fear of our demise ought not to be a reason to vote negative, because that would mean making a decision that kills us 1000 times in our own lifetime. To refuse to react in this manner provides a new manner of decision making that can produce joy and noble values.

Eze 5 [Chielozona, Professor of African and World literatures at Northeastern Illinois University, “Hate Your Enemy: The Anatomy of Resentment in Africa’s Cultural Resistance to the West,” Global Fellows Seminars, http://repositories.cdlib.org/globalfellows/2005/2]

One of the … appears in him.”6

Our critique of the moral grounding in response to the resolution is key to challenge the notions of moralism which are at the heart of violence—only our criticism can make possible a meaningful answer to the questions of who we are as a society and who we want to be—we are a pre-requisite to political action.

Wendy Brown, Political Science—Berkeley, 2000.

Why Nietzsche Still? Reflections on Drama, Culture, and Politics, ed. Alan d. Schrift, p. 214-5

The aim of … formations on its own