General Actions:
Wiki: openCaselist
▼:
Document Index
»
Space: North Texas
▼:
Document Index
»
Page: Pryor-Kersch Neg
# | Date | Entry |
---|---|---|
12/05/2012 | Coloniality KTournament: | Round: | Opponent: | Judge: 1NC AGAINST BROWNFIELDS The knowledge base of the plan is neither true nor objective – it is based on elimination of any combination of forms of thinking – it is an extreme form of thinking that has no privileged claim to access but has taken it by historical domination.Deloria Jr 1999 Vine, Theologian, legal scholar, JD, Ph.D, M.Div, standing rock Sioux, For This Land, 102-105 Example after example could be cited,,, our formulation of a picture of reality. Further, Even attempts at benign energy formations like wind and solar leave massive destruction to native lands. Colonization becomes inherent in the practices of their energy politicsAwehali 2006 (Brian, “Native Energy Futures Renewable Energy, Sovereignty, and the New rush on Indian Lands”, LiP, MDA) The Alaska tribal companies have, according to Scherer, … to, the very industry currently driving the planet to its doom. This structure of thinking privileges western rationality above all else forming the basis of every form of domination and driving the possibilities of global destruction and endemic violenceWilshire 2006 Bruce, Bruce Wilshire is Senior Professor of Philosophy at Rutgers University. For most of his career he has taught there, although he has also held positions at Purdue University and at New York University. He has served as Visiting Professor at Oberlin College, Colorado College, and at Texas A and M University , unlearning the language of conquest p 267-270 From this primal origin point emanate salient features …an audiotape from Osama bin Laden electrifi es and mobilizes the world). Our alternative is to refuse the structure and form of thinking of the affirmative – the plan is a replication of the dominance of western thinking. We must challenge this framework of interpretation of reality and re-examine the basis of knowledge. We must not disavow our goals in service of simple reforms or the call to end suffering but must finally undo the basis of domination.Deloria Jr 1999 Vine, Theologian, legal scholar, JD, Ph.D, M.Div, standing rock Sioux, For This Land, p101-102 If there were any serious concern about liberation we would see … background ofstudents on the basis of their applications for admission.
Our alternative pedagogically calls us to create an abolition of genocidal structures. Only this epistemological starting point can create an effective praxis that will betray the constant management of the effects of genocide in favor of a politics to abolish it. We must begin from the unflinching position that we don’t have to accept status quo structures. Rodríguez 2010 Dylan, “The Disorientation of the Teaching Act: Abolition as Pedagogical Position” Radical Teacher number 88 August 1, 2010 Perhaps, then, there is no viable or defensible …dependent on our willingness to embrace this form of pedagogical audacity. POST-OCCIDENTALISM VERSION Security imperatives that attempt to reduce reliance on foreign resources inevitably drive us to overconsume domestic resources on natives lands – no differentiation in their evidence – prefer ours – we have historical examples Many Indian tribes came out in support of the U.S. … high-level nuclear waste repository on Yucca Mountain, which is on Western Shoshone lands. (See Chapter 3 for more details.) The attempt to close the US off in terms of energy security is a violent American National Identity that forcloses political thought on the economy and lends itself to endemic violence. Even casual observers will be familiar with the … and growth is structured by the militarized pursuit of energy (Campbell, 2005: 952; Christophe Paillard in Luft and Paillard, 2007). The privileging of social sciences as the basis for truth is a form of western domination that violently erases other culture and creates an inaccurate interpretation of reality. My argument here, whilst normatively sympathetic to Kant's moral … help to end the global rule of insecurity and violence? Will our thought? Their form of modernist politics privileges European culture at the center of world history subjecting the peripheral peoples to violence and genocides rendered inevitable and necessary in the name of civilization, rationality, science and philosophy. Their epistemology historically constructs guilt free motives to posit itself as the hero to the world thus justifying its redemptive sacrifice of guilty peoples | |
12/05/2012 | Coloniality K - Wake NEW ALTTournament: | Round: | Opponent: | Judge: The affirmative is a replication of a universal concept of humanity structured through ignorance of the colonial difference. Energy policy begs a different question than just a mere focus on production and consumption. Energy is the structure, the life-blood for the enactment of Eurocentric ideals. Only delinking from this epistemology by abandoning reformist attempts can a new starting point for politics be opened. Mignolo 2006 Walter, Citizenship, Knowledge, and the Limits of Humanity American Literary History 18.2 (2006) 312-331 Evaluating our structures of thought is a paramount concern – thinking has material effects. The plan text is a replication of some of the most destructive formations of thinking in western history – their modification of energy policy reflects overconsumptive cultural formations and massive continuations of colonization on indigenous lands. Even attempts at benign energy formations like wind and solar leave massive destruction to native lands. Colonization becomes inherent in the practices of their energy politics Awehali 2006 (Brian, “Native Energy Futures Renewable Energy, Sovereignty, and the New rush on Indian Lands”, LiP, MDA) The Alaska tribal companies have, according to Scherer, “become a way for The role is the ballot is to affirm an ethic of diversality toward epistemology. Refusing the universality of the modernity is in itself an ethical praxis that refuses the foundation of racism and ethnocide. The second opposition Khatibi attempts to undo (after the opposition between the Christian West Voting negative affirms the ethics of diversality by rejecting the pedagogical dominance of the plan’s approach to energy policy. This is an ongoing act of denying the monopoly to legitimacy of western thinking. The task of debunking is ever an unattractive one, and quite alien to the | |
12/05/2012 | Lacan K - BrownfieldsTournament: | Round: | Opponent: | Judge: Existence has no foundation. The entire functional base of reality is absent. Nature does not exist. It is too imbedded with human interventions. Their understanding of how the natural world works is backwards due to past involvement in the environment. The plan is a retreat into the comfort of ecological salvation which is gone. Along these lines, "terror" means accepting the fact … confidence . . . is originally, a nd truly, always a relationship with reality as a natural totality: as Nature. The entirety of post-politics risk management completely evacuates the radical potential of the status quo in favor of highlighting and guaranteeing the reactionary base of liberal hegemony to all solutions. There is of course a close relationship between the post-political condition … global issues such as the environment, migration, or the use of natural resources” (Urbinati, 2003: 80). Further, this construction and relationship to reality through fantasy is the foremost political question of the debate – massive violence is the product of their construction of the fantasy of reality – our strategy is the best approach to avoid it Fantasy supports reality This signified function of the nodal point is not, however, solely reduced to its discursive position. It … on the symptom is revealed, then the play—the relation—between the symptom and fantasy reveals itself as another mode of the play between the real and the symbolic/imaginary nexus producing reality. The affirmative’s energy management replicates the closure of the post-political climate. Its ideological divisions take even the most emancipatory of demands and reduce them to mere technical outcomes devoid of political potetntial. It is not a true political space but rather an attempt to close off dissensus. Slavoj Žižek and Chantal Mouffe, among others, define the post-political as a political formation that actually forecloses the political, …doing so, it does not translate Marx’s dictum for the contemporary period, but turns it into its radical travesty. We must abandon the basis of the political inherent to the affirmative. The plan is misplaced intervention as part of the policy order – the alternative re-navigates the political possibilities of new actions by disavowing the tainted and old. Taking the environmental and climatic catastrophe seriously … socio-ecological futures that express the democratic presumptions of freedom and equality. | |
12/05/2012 | Lacan K - ApocalypseTournament: | Round: | Opponent: | Judge: The imagination of the apocalypse produces a banality of catastrophe that destroys ethical engagement by disenchanting politics and life from one another. Their approach to politics produces a neurotic irrational citizenry ripe for the profiteering of disaster capitalism that manufactures scenarios for their impacts Removing the future connotations to catastrophe disables the eschatological foundations of catastrophe It is thus all the more urgent to state today that … have always been lived co-incident with eschatology in "the mean time." | |
12/05/2012 | Lacan K - HeideggerTournament: | Round: | Opponent: | Judge: And, the heideggerian approach to being and care is the exact opposite approach with how to confront this question of existence – it is a failure in creating a proper reorientation to the environment. The alternative is comparatively better because it is not reliant upon the fantasy of the natural world to structure our being towards. Further, this construction and relationship to reality through fantasy is the foremost political question of the debate – massive violence is the product of their construction of the fantasy of reality – our strategy is the best approach to avoid it Our alternative is the radical politicization of death: the embrace of ecological destruction. We refuse the affirmative’s affective choice to care. The affirmative represents a failed mimetic attempt to resuscitate our relationship to ecology through altering our consciousness: we instead rebuke this notion thereby interrupting the underlying fantasmic relationship. We must abandon the basis of the political inherent to the affirmative. The entrance of the environment as an ontological question situates politics as a prison-house. | |
12/05/2012 | Lacan K - UtopianismTournament: | Round: | Opponent: | Judge: Stavrakakis 99, Lacan and the Political, pg. 99-101, 1999. The alternative is to embrace the impossibility of our desires- this fundamentally re-orients our relation to how we view social antagonisms. By saying 'We are all Jews!', … in fact, democratic equivalent of such an attitude? | |
12/05/2012 | Lacan K - EnvironmentTournament: | Round: | Opponent: | Judge: Discourses of climate change represent a fundamental victimage of humanity bound to an empty vacuous environmental enemy. The rhetoric of the environment is a prison-house of social constraints that eliminates subjectivity. We must abandon the basis of the political inherent to the affirmative. The affirmative is misplaced intervention as part of the policy order – the alternative re-navigates the political possibilities of new actions by disavowing the tainted and old. | |
12/05/2012 | Agamben K - TERA NativesTournament: | Round: | Opponent: | Judge: Karen Shimakawa (Professor University of California, Davis) 2004 The Things We Share: Ethnic Performativity and "Whatever Being", The Journal of Speculative Philosophy 18.2 149-160 The affirmative cedes the power of inclusion to the law, which is based in metaphysics. Only if we stop giving law, this ability, will it cease to define what is right or wrong, what is included or what is excluded. As she reminds us it is crucial to recall … or similarly for the formation of the Law (of law) as an ineffable depth. Our alternative is “whatever being,” the singular being—an appreciation of forms of life without referent to an ends. The removal of the power of the sovereign by not tying Native identity to inclusion within American political structures or energy policy. | |
12/05/2012 | Courts CPTournament: | Round: | Opponent: | Judge: Courts defer to preemption and the executive branch now – new ruling is key to environmental federalism | |
12/05/2012 | Econ and Warming DefenseTournament: | Round: | Opponent: | Judge: No global economic collapse and it wouldn’t cause conflict So, when we last left off this debate, things were looking grim. US isn’t key to the global economy – prefer expert consensus Is the global economy becoming immune to U.S. economic downturns? According Warming Adv Climate impacts are overyhyped, nothing will happen for 300 years and even then it won’t be that bad, tech solves in the meantime These alarmist predictions are becoming quite bizarre, and could be dismissed as sociological oddities No anthropogenic warming – WE control quals, bias and recency Despite all the sound and fury surrounding this episode over the last week, really ---No impact – media and scientists exaggerate catastrophic warming The media can always find an expert who is willing to provide some juicy quotes --No impact to warming NASA satellite data from the years 2000 through 2011 show the Earth’s atmosphere is allowing A2 Diseases No consensus on warming – disproves disease Isn’t There a Consensus? Science doesn’t advance by “consensus.” A single scientist Infectious diseases can’t cause extinction – population density mitigates virulence through resistance A2 Resource Wars No resource wars—humans adapt and new tech solves—their studies are wrong A2 Coral Reefs/Biodiversity Coral reefs adapt to climate change. The long-term response of coral reefs to climate change depends on the ability No impact to biodiversity Although one may agree with ecologists such as Ehrlich and Raven that the earth stands | |
12/05/2012 | Wind Solvency DefenseTournament: | Round: | Opponent: | Judge: between 2007 and 2009, the nation’s¶ cumulative wind capacity doubled. | |
12/06/2012 | Renewable Shift DATournament: | Round: | Opponent: | Judge: Democrats and Republicans are now saying President … it comes to energy in this country.¶ | |
12/06/2012 | Politics - Farm BillTournament: | Round: | Opponent: | Judge: | |
12/06/2012 | Carbon Tax CPTournament: | Round: | Opponent: | Judge: Carbon tax could be implemented immediately – solves warming and restores US negotiating credibility ensuring international action | |
12/06/2012 | Elections - Romney GoodTournament: | Round: | Opponent: | Judge: Wind power key to Obama --- can even swing Republicans. Obama reelection causes unilateral disarm --- kills deterrence and results in nuclear war. | |
12/06/2012 | FrameworkTournament: | Round: | Opponent: | Judge: “Resolved” before a colon reflects a legislative forum 53. The term "incentives," for purposes of … "disincentive" approach to behavioral modification. 2. Violation: the aff defends individual action to “live like suns” 3. Vote neg— Second, Ground is key to meaningful discussion—the alternative is violence. Third, this is an independent voting issue—unfair ground. B. Education— Second, Policy debate is key to reverese domination of politics by private powerful interests. C. Limits— Second, Limit explosion kills debate and all politics turns the aff. 4. Vote neg—only you can prevent the activity from collapsing. | |
12/06/2012 | Fiscal CliffTournament: | Round: | Opponent: | Judge: Capital key to a deal, averts depression | |
01/07/2013 | Victimization KTournament: | Round: | Opponent: | Judge: Consider, more generally, attempts at … become the norms by which we are regulated. Like all ideologies, the varieties of … revolt against all authority and all social roles. Bush continues, “Great harm has been … by the state in response to national victimization. | |
03/29/2013 | NDT Round 1 1NCTournament: | Round: | Opponent: George Mason KL | Judge: Mignolo 2006 Walter, Citizenship, Knowledge, and the Limits of Humanity American Literary History 18.2 (2006) 312-331 Evaluating our structures of thought is a paramount concern – thinking has material effects. The plan text is a replication of some of the most destructive formations of thinking in western history – their modification of energy policy reflects overconsumptive cultural formations and massive continuations of colonization on indigenous lands. Even attempts at benign energy formations like wind and solar leave massive destruction to native lands. Colonization becomes inherent in the practices of their energy politics Awehali 2006 (Brian, “Native Energy Futures Renewable Energy, Sovereignty, and the New rush on Indian Lands”, LiP, MDA) The Alaska tribal companies have, according to Scherer, “become a way for The role is the ballot is to affirm an ethic of diversality toward epistemology. Refusing the universality of the modernity is in itself an ethical praxis that refuses the foundation of racism and ethnocide. The second opposition Khatibi attempts to undo (after the opposition between the Christian West Voting negative affirms the ethics of diversality by rejecting the pedagogical dominance of the plan’s approach to energy policy. This is an ongoing act of denying the monopoly to legitimacy of western thinking. The task of debunking is ever an unattractive one, and quite alien to the | |
03/29/2013 | 1NC T RestrictionTournament: NDT | Round: 3 | Opponent: | Judge: A – Interpretation:Restrictions are outright prohibitions on production, not consequences of regulatory schemes. (Kevin T., “Are Noncompetition Covenants Among Law Partners Against Public Policy?”, Georgia Law Review, Spring, 28 Ga. L. Rev. 807, Lexis) “On” means in contact with and links “restrictions” only to energy production (Arthur Butler, “Brief for Appellants – Wilson v. Dorflinger and Sons”, Court of Appeals – State of New York, Reg. 108, Fol. 387, 1916, p. 11-12) B – Violation – the aff streamlines regulation on energy production – it does not reduce a restrictionC – Reasons to prefer“Regulations” is conceptually larger than “restrictions” – they expand a resolutional question of limited producer choices to one of all state intervention. (Barak, Professor of Law @ Arizona College of Law, “What is Regulation?”, in Regulation: Why and How The State Regulates (Foundation Press 2012), Yale Journal of Regulations Online 30(1): http:~/~/yale-jreg.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Orbach_30.pdf, DZ) Limits outweigh – determines the feasibility of pre-tournament research, which controls the direction of education. Limitless education is pointless and unfair because it always benefits the aff.D – Topicality is a voting issue for fairness and education – plus, it’s a rule at the NDT! | |
03/29/2013 | 1NC Modernity KTournament: NDT | Round: 3 | Opponent: | Judge: the nuclear age has created the belief in unending technological progress around the structure of human extinction. nuclear power is part of this overall structure of nationbuilding. this pursuit of security renders possible the attempts at immortality of the nation via the destruction of the nation. this form of utopianism is particularly dangerousMASCO IN 2006 Joseph, The Nuclear Borderlands, 0691120773, p ___1-3_______ ( class="MsoNormal" ) —sentences them to second-class status with regard to the future. ( class="MsoNormal" ) Additionally, colleges and universities (both public and private) also exist as sites AND | |
03/29/2013 | 1NC Virillio KTournament: NDT | Round: 3 | Opponent: | Judge: The impact is the worst totalitarianisms of history. The speed structure constructs the basis of globalitarianism ripping humanity of any valueAdams 2003 ( class="StyleStyleBold12pt" style="font-size:7.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:11.0pt" )(Jason, The Evergreen State College, POPULAR DEFENSE IN THE EMPIRE OF SPEED: PAUL VIRILIO AND THE PHENOMENOLOGY OF THE POLITICAL BODY. THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS - In the Department Of Political Science - SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY - November 2003) Our alternative is to refuse the administration of risk management of the 1ac’s concern for accidentsVIRILIO IN 2006 Paul, The Original Accident, isbn: 0745636136 p ____16-18____ | |
03/29/2013 | 1NC Accidents AdvTournament: NDT | Round: 3 | Opponent: | Judge: No impact to accidents/meltdownsFormer submarine Engineer Officer, Founder, Adams Atomic Engines, Inc., “Has Apocalyptic Portrayal of Climate Change Risk Backfired?”, May 2, http:~/~/atomicinsights.com/2012/05/has-apocalyptic-portrayal-of-climate-change-risk-backfired.html?utm_source=feedburnerandutm_medium=feedandutm_campaign=html?utm_source=feedburnerandutm_medium=feedandutm_campaign=Feed3A+AtomicInsights+28Atomic+Insights29 Not only was the discussion enlightening about the reasons why different people end up with AND and must not be marginalized by the people who market fear and trembling. too many alt causes to oceansBlack ‘11() Richard Black, Environment correspondent, BBC News. “World's oceans in 'shocking' decline”. June 20, 2011. BBC News. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-13796479 AND Their accidents advantage uniquely force us into the bubble mentalityBaudrillard 89 Baudrillard 1989 (Jean, America, Translated by Chris Turner, Pages 40-42) AND | |
03/29/2013 | 1NC Public Sphere AdvTournament: NDT | Round: 3 | Opponent: | Judge: Their so-called new safety protocols presume a universal rational individual that does not exist. This means their ways of thinking are bound to the same structures that make genocide possible to begin with.Ian WELSH Sociology @ Cardiff ‘2K Mobilising Modernity p. 22-23 This epistemology becomes self-reinforcing. Nuclear is not just a technology it is a political ploy for centralization of power and scientific hegemony.Ian WELSH Sociology @ Cardiff ‘2K Mobilising Modernity p. 3-9 Nature does not exist but in the imagination. The affirmative takes the role which superimposes a utopian concept of nature to relate policy through. Nature in the affirmative’s discourse is impossible, rather it is chaotic and unpredictably uncontrollable. Their base ontological relationship to nature ensures an obsessive reactionary politics bound to endlessly acting without altering the fundamental coordinates of society.Swyngedouw 2006( style="font-size:8.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:11.0pt" ) Erik, Impossible “Sustainability” and the Post-Political Condition Erik Swyngedouw Department of Geography, School of Environment and Development, Manchester University, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK erik.swyngedouw@man.ac.uk September 2006 | |
03/29/2013 | 2NC Modernity KTournament: NDT | Round: 3 | Opponent: | Judge: Ortiz 2012 (Michael; Taking Henry Giroux’s Borderless Pedagogy to Our Institutions of Higher Learning; Aug 4; truth-out.org/opinion/item/10549-continuing-toward-girouxs-borderless-pedagogy Additionally, colleges and universities (both public and private) also exist as sites All of our links are disads to the permutation that prove the epistemology of the affirmative is tainted – this alternative doesn’t function by overcoming the status quo but by refusing the universalism of the western narrative, utilization of their epistemology serves to continue the status quo. And, your permutation is merely the same attempt to continue the western frame of thinking. The attempt at making minor epistemic adjustments via reforms is not enough. We need a radical epistemological re-evaluation. Further, the alternative is a sequencing question – before we can effectively engage we have to have the questioning of the epistemology of the aff. Two pieces of mignolo evidence prove the need to remove the base epistemic foundation of the plan. Prefer the alternative over the permutation – their permutation serves the interest of expediency. we are the only ones with comparative evidence about questioning and political expediency in the context of western epistemology | |
03/29/2013 | 2NC Case DebateTournament: NDT | Round: 3 | Opponent: | Judge: Nature does not exist but in the imagination. The affirmative takes the role which superimposes a utopian concept of nature to relate policy through. Nature in the affirmative’s discourse is impossible, rather it is chaotic and unpredictably uncontrollable. Their base ontological relationship to nature ensures an obsessive reactionary politics bound to endlessly acting without altering the fundamental coordinates of society.Swyngedouw 2006 ~[Erik, Impossible "Sustainability" and the Post-Political Condition Erik Swyngedouw Department of Geography, School of Environment and Development, Manchester University, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK erik.swyngedouw@man.ac.uk September 2006 of the present world’s way of life. So, while one sort of From a CIA Memo sent to the Director of the Department of Energy in 1979: | |
03/29/2013 | 1NR Virillio KTournament: NDT | Round: 3 | Opponent: | Judge: Nothing lost, nothing gained. If inventing the substance means indirectly inventing the accident Perm do both – still links, wil be coopted - The question of speed predetermines all– evaluating consequences of the plan normativizes the discussion of speed society. Perm do the alt – is severance and a voter – severs out of the policy framing of the affirmative – destroys clash and eduation. | |
03/29/2013 | 1NR Accidents AdvTournament: NDT | Round: 3 | Opponent: | Judge: No impact to meltdowns Nuclear power is safe Ocean Defense Oceans are already entering a period of unprecedented destruction – too many alt causes such as over-fishing, pollution and climate change – that’s Black Multiple factors working in combination means you cannot solve oceans collapse. "The rate of change is vastly exceeding what we were expecting even a couple Climate change proves Oceans and marine bioD are resilient – alarmist predictions empirically denied Oceans resilient Baudrillard AII the events described here are susceptible to two kinds of diagnosis: physical and Tons of regulations besides the NRC They propel the acceleration of nuclear energy. This slope leads to deterrence or the infinite growth of energy. Turns the aff - Their ev is just media alarmism. | |
03/30/2013 | NDT Rd 5Tournament: | Round: | Opponent: | Judge: Multicultural Debate badWe live in the age of multiculturalism. Exclusion is not predicated upon open violence but ideological covertness. The fascism of our age makes time for the stories of the oppressedZizek 1999 ~Slavoj, Senior Researcher at Institute for Social Studies, Ljubliana, The Ticklish Subject: the absent centre of political ontology, New York: Verso, 1999, 186~ Crucial for a successful Ideology is thus the tension within its particular content between the There is an inherent violence in debate’s relationship to the academy. Even with new energies, there are no changes to topics or what we discuss. The academy has a vested interest in maintaining colonization of native landsMihesuah and Wilson 2004 ~Devon, prof of applied indigenous studies and history at northern Arizona st, and assistant prof of indigenous history at Arizona st, indigenizing the academy, p 3-4 As we reflect upon what it means to "Indigenize the academy," we are The affirmative is emblematic of further failures of the left who attempt to challenge the base of liberalism but don’t reconcile the political underpinnings. There is no effective change possible through the system of debate.Zizek 1999 ~Slavoj, Senior Researcher at Institute for Social Studies, Ljubliana, The Ticklish Subject: the absent centre of political ontology, New York: Verso, 1999, 221-2~ Paradoxically, today’s true conservatives are, rather, leftist ’critical theorists’ who reject both Multicultural respect for particular groups perpetuates the hegemonic inevitability of capital by rendering it invisible and depoliticizing the economyZizek 1999 ~Slavoj, Senior Researcher at Institute for Social Studies, Ljubliana, The Ticklish Subject: the absent centre of political ontology, New York: Verso, 1999, 217-and 8~ And, mutatis mutandis, the same goes for today’s capitalist, who still clings Failure to overcome this structural barrier prevents any radicality in the affirmative’s method. There is no energy produced to changing debate, thingsmerely become enveloped into further pockets of tolerance.Zizek 1999 ~Slavoj, Senior Researcher at Institute for Social Studies, Ljubliana, The Ticklish Subject: the absent centre of political ontology, New York: Verso, 1999, 218-9~ The falsity of elitist multiculturalist liberalism lies in the tension between content and form which The narrative of the 1ac is thus only a function to describe the antagonisms below it, they do not paint a picture of resolution that enabls an overcoming of the violence toward the voices of the 1caZizek 1997 ~Slavoj, The Plague of Fantasies, NYC: Verso, 1999, 10-1~ The third point: fantasy is the primordial form of narrative, which serves to This modern imperial system ensures that Differentiations exist between the ontological worlds of identity politics. These differentiations are central to violence and extermination and necessitate unending war.Balibar 2001 (Etienne, Emeritus Prof. of Philosophy @ U. of Paris X Nanterre and U. of Cal., Irvine, "Outlines of a Topography of Cruelty: Citizenship and Civility in the Era of Global Violence," Constellations, Vol. 8.1) this paper is based on a talk which I was asked to deliver in November Radical strategies of visibility are part of sovereign violence. Their call for energizing debate relies on dated policies that replicate a multiplicity of strategies used by imperial powers in the status quo. The methodology should not energize debate but rather should render debate useless. Do not protect debate from its slow death, hasten it by voting negative.Maximilian Forte 2009 ~"useless anthropology: strategies for dealing with the militarization fo the academy", http://zeroanthropology.net/2009/05/22/%E2%80%9Cuseless-anthropology%E2%80%9D-strategies-for-dealing-with-the-militarization-of-the-academy/-http://zeroanthropology.net/2009/05/22/%E2%80%9Cuseless-anthropology%E2%80%9D-strategies-for-dealing-with-the-militarization-of-the-academy/ ~ One does not need to seek employment with the Pentagon, take part in counterinsurgency Our social position is that of debaters. We are all intimately affected by ballot libidinally. Voting to kill debate is the most ethical response we can make to interrupt the processes of multicultural education that fuel international imperialism. The only way to open up space for a new kind of activity is to renounce facile calls to direct action to save debate.SlavojZizek, Senior Researcher at the Institute for Social Studies in Ljubljana, 2004, Iraq: The Borrowed Kettle, p. 71-74 Whatever BeingFullerton wants debate to be "inclusive" of the life experiences they have had. The very idea that there is an inside is what creates an outside. We should not assign particular grounds upon which are. In the case of debate, we should want to participate, but we should not base our inclusion/exclusion on whether or not we win a round on any given argument. They will attempt to argue that the aff has nothing to do with judging validation Our alternative is "whatever being," the singular being—an appreciation of forms of life without referent to an ends. For the purposes of debate, this means that debaters should not judge their inclusion or exclusion based on whether or not they win or lose a round. This removes the power of the sovereign; in this case the judge and the structure of debate as an activity. Instead of fighting for control of the debate apparatus, we advocate that teams should participate in the way that they would like without an appeal for inclusion. Voting negative is not an act of exclusion or of assigning power to North Texas but rather a method to refuse failed categorizationHeesok Chang (Change Department of English Vassar College) Postmodern Culture September 1993 Community PICText: Ofir Stolarski, Ashley Moore, Brian Kersch, Shelby Pryor, Jake Ziering, Jackie Massey, Stephen Davis and anyone else who so desires should confront trans rage.The term ’community’ is meant to resurrect the us versus them mentality – the act of constituting a ’community’ breeds injustice, inequality and violence towards the otherBruce Arrigo, Professor at California School of Professional Psychology, 1999 Journal of Political and Military Sociology, Winter, http://www.academyanalyticarts.org/arrigo.htm 2NCKill DebateFurther, the narratives themselves are never given full credit and truth. They are just a story, mere fantasy. The use of stories and narratives is descriptive of the link par excellence. Accepting the validity of all narratives equally creates a dull and homogenous multiculturalism and stifles anti-fascist political struggles – this means there never will be mobilization from the 1ac.Zizek 2002 ~Slavoj, "I am a Fighting Athest: Interview with SlavojZizek," Bad Subjects, Issue 59 Feb 2002, eserver.org/bs/59/zizek.html~ Zizek: I think that we should accept that universalism is a Eurocentrist notion. Further, we are not speaking abstractly about violence and debate – there is a connection between American collegiate debate and massive violence in Afghanistan. Voting to energize debate is a death sentence for afghani citizens.Hicks and Greene 2009 ~Darrin, University of Denver and Ronald Walter Greene, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities Conscientious Objections: Debating Both Sides and the Cultures of Democracy, Source: Conference Proceedings — National Communication Association/American Forensic Association (Alta Conference on Argumentation) Date: January 1, 2010 The problem with reducing our position to the claim that debate promotes American imperialism is Alt SolvesThere is no capacity for a permutation, we are the direct opposite of the aff. Do not save debate, walk away from it. Voting affirmative invests you into committing energies to resolving debate, voting negative guts it and begins the ontological precipice of refusing the basis of empire.Vine Deloria Jr 1999 ~Theologian, legal scholar, JD, Ph.D, M.Div, standing rock Sioux, For This Land, p101-102~ If there were any serious concern about liberationwe would see thousands of people simply walk Our ethico-political obligation is to refuse the debate apparatus that is invested in capitalist colonialism. We are obviously debating, but the question in this moment is how or what we are debating for or against. Capitalism render’s its victims anonymous and ensures that the aff’s personal focus never come to terms with the billions of degraded life choices globally—our epitstemological position as callous as it may be is a PREREQUISITE to understanding the full extent of accessibility concerns.SlavojZizek andGlyn Daly, Senior Lecturer in Politics in the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences at University College, Northampton, 2004, Conversations With Zizek, p. 14-16 For Zizek it is imperative that we cut through this Gord¬ian knot of postmodern protocol 1NR2NC – O/VThey posit the starting point of their advocacy as one of evoking social and cultural change within a debate community, we start instead with a question of individuals in this space. 3 reasons this framing should be preferred:1 – It was their agency arguments – to submit to notions of collective identity is to cede all agency – this is the same logic of static gender categories that proscribe a certain biological sexual identity onto others.2 – Your ballot only has control over the discourses of this space, not a community writ large. Other debates prove that community transformation is long-term and only works in the local abstract – their framework superimposes the interests of the majority on individuals, which means that we control the direction to their impact.3 – External impact of alternative community backlash – communities don’t exist in vacuums – rather, they exist in conjunction with other communities – to presuppose unique agency to our community is to impose superiority over others – this prevents an authentic encounter with Other communities, which superimposes violence and agency dissolution amongst others. Our alternative solves best because the attempt to find the Universal Community Identity is impossible – rather, this position begins and ends with the question of the individual.Reliance on community is the source for racism and other exclusionsIris Marion Young, 1986, Social Theory and Practice Racism, ethnic chauvinism, and class devaluation, I suggest, grow partly from Role of the BallotWe engage your role of the ballot argument in a couple of ways.A. The counterplan calls into question your ability to meet the role of the ballot – the idea of "best performatively" implies a successful method of engaging affect in debate. Our argument proves the starting point turns the aff.
The symbolic construction of community requires the elimination of difference—Moves toward assimilations are inherent in labels of community AT: CP Doesn’t Tell Personal ExperienceFirst, our offense:1 – Their framework nullifies and turns the value of their narrative – the 1AC *analogizes* their personal experience and narrative to justify a universal Community narrative that would inevitably silence it. This appeal to the Community being in the background, nonetheless, is the very logic of individual agency submission they claim to reject.2 – Our framework is a better way of including individual narrative– narratives may be important, but the context in which they are deployed determine their political and micro-political potential – our advocacy provides a venue in which these don’t become commodified by larger social structures.3 – We’ve answered the better version of their argument – if their argument is "you should have told stories", this is reductionists because:A – It’s impossible to evaluate a debate based on quality of story.B – All argument is already enacted and performed always – our Arrigo evidence says the only question for the ballot is *how that performance relates to otherness* - theirs silences the question under a monolithic umbrella of Community, ours lets that voice come out under a foundation of individuality.AT: Perm1. Textually severance, voting issue because a stable advocacy and position is the determining factor for all interrogation and all clash and all negative ground. If we win any risk that discourse impacts reality, then this is not simply a whine because it’s indistinguishable from severing an entire plank of the plan.2. word choice is not a mere accident – it’s a reflection of ideologyWenden, 2003 (Anita L., Professor Emerita of Research and Academic Writing and Professor Emerita of cultural Diversity at York College, "Achieving a Comprehensive Peace," April, Peace and Change, Vol. 28, No. 2) Perm is incoherent absent a resolution of the starting point question – if we win that starting at notions of individuality and rejecting notions of community is a better form of individual liberation, the perm would still include an inauthentic politic.Saying the word ’perm’ should be a reason they lose – it assumes that our notion of individuality can be colonized by a notion of Community – furthermore, this is intellectual violence that has occurred *in the debate space* and reason they lose independently.Three disads to the permutation:1 – Agency collusion – the perm leads to a mixture of community and invididual based politics without any clear distinction – this makes *grey-zones* inevitable – silences voices and our 1NC evidence proves this makes individual oppression inevitable.2 – Authenticism – to permute is to jettison one’s initial world in hope of joining another perspective – this replicates colonialism and is a reason that the *method of a permutation* makes it collapse on itself.3 – Competition – to say "permutation" is to stipulate that arguments in a debate must compete. This notion of competition replicates an us-them dichotomy which makes violence and abject oppression inevitable. This guarantees Community norms never become visible because they function by *erasing difference*.Our model would reject a notion of competition in favor of a notion of individual interactionalism – the role of the ballot is simply to determine which ballot allows for the most agency for individuals – the perm and their aff foreclose this.Community seeks to eliminate difference by relying on a metaphysics of presenceIris Marion Young, 1986, Social Theory and Practice I criticize the notion of community on both philosophical and practical grounds. I argue Metaphysics of presence eliminate potential openings for diversity and recreates transgender violence by upholding male/female binary.Iris Marion Young, 1986, Social Theory and Practice The desire to bring things into unity generates a logic of hierarchical opposition. Any Metaphyisics of presence deny differenceIris Marion Young, 1986, Social Theory and Practice Second, the metaphysics of presence represses or denies difference. This term has come They have zero defense of debate community as the starting pointOnly the cp solves. We lead to a change in what you recognize as a community: A – Formation of micro-groups, such as judges/debaters in a room – these are the only communes we have control over, which is a solvency takeout to the 1AC and a reason only the CP results in change.B – These micro-groups spill over:1 – This is the function of how every debate impacts the social2 – Individual experience changes how we relate to others discoursively outside of this setting – focus on setting as opposed to a community in which that setting is.Language critique solves – challenging unconscious understandings of the world is key to changing political affectLakoff, UC Berkeley linguistics professor, co-founder and Senior Fellow of the Rockridge Institute, 2001 The power to identify community bounds is the power to exclude and individuals can be systematically devaluedCalderwood, ’00 ~ Patricia E. Calderwood, Assistant professor in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction at Fairfield University. "When Community Fails to Transform: Raveling and Unraveling a "Community of Writers"" The Urban Review, Vol. 32, No. 3, 2000~ The demarcation of community is an act of setting boundaries for exclusion—the maintenance of communities requires defense of borders keeping outsiders outCalderwood, ’00 ~ Patricia E. Calderwood, Assistant professor in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction at Fairfield University. "When Community Fails to Transform: Raveling and Unraveling a "Community of Writers"" The Urban Review, Vol. 32, No. 3, 2000~ public values are shaped by the discourse used in public policyClark 7 | |
03/31/2013 | NDT Rd 7 - Coloniality KTournament: NDT | Round: 7 | Opponent: UMKC AG | Judge: 1NCHeideggerian being’s relationship to death ignores colonial realities that force colonized to confront death daily. The search for authenticity goes hand in hand with colonial violence as it valorizes destruction of the non-entity marked upon colonial bodies.Maldonado-Torres 07 ~Nelson, On the Coloniality of Being, Cultural Studies, 21(2), 240-270, published May 2007~ Heideggerian being assumes the neutrality of humanity and ignores epistemic foundations of coloniality that reinscribe themselves in the non-being of the colonized and racialized bodies.Maldonado-Torres 07 ~Nelson, On the Coloniality of Being, Cultural Studies, 21(2), 240-270, published May 2007~ Their form of modernist politics privileges European culture at the center of world history subjecting the peripheral peoples to violence and genocides rendered inevitable and necessary in the name of civilization, rationality, science and philosophy. Their epistemology historically constructs guilt free motives to posit itself as the hero to the world thus justifying its redemptive sacrifice of guilty peoplesMignolo 2000 ~Walter, William H. Wannamaker Professor of Literature and Romance Studies at Duke University Local Histories/Global Designs, 0691001405 115-117 Our alternative is Epistemic Disobedience to modernity. Epistemic Disobedience is the only ethical response to modernity’s hegemony on knowledge production. To be an ethical agent in a post-occidental world one must delink from modernity as a means of being outside hegemonic knowledge.Mignolo 09 ~Walter D. Mignolo, Epistemic Disobedience, Independent Thought and Decolonial Freedom, Theory and Culture 2009, published 2009~ ONCE UPON a time scholars assumed that the knowing subject in the disciplines is transparent Another representation released by the Navajo includes that…~SLOW DOWN~ Young 2001 ~William, Emeritus Prof Religious Studies, Westminster college, Quest for Harmony: native American spiritual tradition p 248-251 According to the Navajo conception, the universe is inhabited by two types of " 2NCEpistemology precedes OntologyMingolo and He 12 ~Walter Mignolo, Professor of Decolonial Studies at Duke University, Weihua He, Ph.D. from Tsinghua University in Beijing. He is currently teaching in Shanghai and spent a year at Duke University while finishing his dissertation. The Prospect of Harmony and the Decolonial View of the World, published in Decolonial Thoughts, Interviews. September 2012~ New epistemological approaches are key – without alternative approaches there is no way for most of the population to access our discussions or to create real world change. Only delinking from modernist thought balances empiricist analysis with localized forms of knowledge.Code 6 ~Lorraine; Ecological Thinking: The Politics of Epistemic Location~ And the academic production of the 1ac is itself parasitic upon colonized personsMihesuah and Wilson 2004 ~Devon, prof of applied indigenous studies and history at northern Arizona st, and assistant prof of indigenous history at Arizona st, indigenizing the academy, p 3-4 | |
03/31/2013 | NDT Rd 7 - Lacan KTournament: NDT | Round: 7 | Opponent: UMKC AG | Judge: Existence has no foundation. The entire functional base of reality is absent. Nature does not exist. It is too imbedded with human interventions. Their understanding of how the natural world works is backwards due to past involvement in the environment. Care is an impossible approach to waste.ZIZEK 2008 ~Slavoj, In defense of Lost causes, isbn: 9781844671083, p 442-4 ~ And, the heideggerian approach to being is the exact opposite approach with how to confront this question of existence – it is a failure in creating a proper reorientation to the environment. The alternative is comparatively better because it is not reliant upon the fantasy of the natural world to structure our being towards.ZIZEK 2008 ~Slavoj, In defense of Lost causes, isbn: 9781844671083, p 448-451 Further, this construction and relationship to reality through fantasy is the foremost political question of the debate – massive violence is the product of their construction of the fantasy of reality – our strategy is the best approach to avoid itStavrakakis 99 ~YannisStavrakakis, Visiting professor at the University of Essex, Lacan and the Political, pg.62-65~ Our alternative is to abandon the basis of the political inherent to the affirmative. The entrance of the environment as an ontological question situates politics as a prison-house.Swyngedouw 2011 ~Erik, Depoliticized Environments: The End of Nature, Climate Change and the PostPolitical Condition, Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement / Volume 69 / October 2011, pp 253 274 DOI: 10.1017/S1358246111000300, Published online: 22 September 2011 | |
03/31/2013 | NDT Rd 7 - Case vs HeideggerTournament: NDT | Round: 7 | Opponent: UMKC AG | Judge: Turn – AuthoritarianismThe alternative necessitates blindness which guarantees totalitariansimSlavoj Zizek 1999 "The Ticklish Subject" p. 13-5 As Heidegger himself put it, those who came closest to the ontological Truth are This precludes engagement with the other – makes violence inevitableLevinas, ’96 ~Emmanuel, Professor of Philosophy at the Sorbonne, Levinas Basic Philosophical Writings, p. 9-10~ In relation to beings in the opening of being, comprehension finds a signification for Heideggers jargon is just a cop out to avoid answering the real question of what to do in the face of real violence – it results in an ideology of power that makes true resistance impossible making violent atrocities inevitableRalph Dumain (Librarian-Archivist-Information Specialist Researcher-Scholar) 2003 "Heidegger’s Jargon" http://www.autodidactproject.org/my/jargon.html Bourdieu’s book was quite fascinating, in that he focused on Heidegger’s terminology from the |
Tournament | Round | Report |
---|
Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete? |
---|
Air Force
Amherst
Appalachian State
Arizona State
Army
Augustana
Bard
Baylor
Binghamton
Boston College
CSU Northridge
CSU Sacramento
CUNY
Cal Berkeley
Cal Lutheran
Cal Poly SLO
Case Western
Central Florida
Central Oklahoma
Chico
Clarion
Columbia
Concordia
Cornell
Dartmouth
Denver
Drexel-Swarthmore
ENMU
East Los Angeles College
Eastern Washington
Emory
Emporia
Fayetteville State
Florida
Florida Int'l
Florida State
Fordham
Fort Hays
Fresno State
Fullerton
Gainesville State
George Mason
George Washington
Georgetown
Georgia
Georgia State
Georgia Tech
Gonzaga
Harvard
Houston
Idaho State
Illinois
Illinois State
Indiana
Iowa
James Madison
John Carroll
Johns Hopkins
Johnson County CC
KCKCC
Kansas
Kansas State
Kentucky
LA City College
Lafayette
Lewis-Clark State College
Liberty
Lindenwood
Los Rios
Louisiana-Lafayette
Louisville
Loyola
Macalester
Marist
Mary Washington
Mercer
Methodist
Miami FL
Miami OH
Michigan
Michigan State
Minnesota
Mission
Missouri State
NYU
Navy
New School
North Texas
Northern Iowa
Northwestern
Notre Dame
Ohio Wesleyan
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pepperdine
Piedmont
Pittsburgh
Portland State
Princeton
Puget Sound
Redlands
Richmond
Rochester
Rutgers
Samford
San Diego State
San Francisco State
Santa Clara
South Florida St Pete
Southern Methodist
Southwestern
Stanford
Texas State
Texas-Austin
Texas-Dallas
Texas-San Antonio
Texas-Tyler
Towson
Trinity
UCLA
UDC-CC
UMKC
UNLV
USC
Utah
Vanderbilt
Vermont
Virginia Tech
Wake Forest
Washington
Wayne State
Weber
West Georgia
West Virginia
Western Connecticut
Whitman
Wichita State
Wisconsin Oshkosh
Wyoming