Tournament: GSU | Round:  | Opponent:  | Judge:
There is no reason to vote affirmative: They cannot articulate any linkage between their prescriptions and practical, worldly effects  

Schlag 90

(Professor of Law at University of Colorade, 1990, Pireer, Stanford Law Review, November, Page Lexis)

In fact... advice into effect.

Their conception of communication is normative - the affirmative view language as a neutral conduit for thought, which neglects that much of language is ineffective

Schlag 90

(Professor of Law at University of Colorade, 1990, Pireer, Stanford Law Review, November, Page Lexis)

One answer is... in constructing communication.

Their description of the status quo presupposes a rational, autonomous subject that not only describes the bureaucracy, but also our agency to act as empowered cartersian egos - in reality, these subject positions do not exist

Schlag 91

(Pierre, Colorado Law Professor, 139 U. PA REV. 801, April)

For these legal thinkers... the legal academy practice.

Their rhetorical performance shields us for responsibility for our own contributions to material pain and suffering

Delgado 91

(Richard, Colorado Law Professor, 139 PA L. REV. 933 April)

But what is the cash value... has been faced with subsistence claims

Tournament:  | Round:  | Opponent:  | Judge:
The U.S. marries destructive military capabilities to a policy of selective engagement to make it’s military appear less threatening - ignoring the way our isolation of threats can incite aggression frames our response in a way that creates a self-fullfiling prophecy - oh and your threats are constructed.

Grondin 2004 (David Grondin, Masters in Political Science and Ph.D. Candidate – University of Ottawa, 2004, (“(Re)Writing the ‘National Security State,’ Center for United States Studies, p. 12-17, MT)

 "Approaches that deconstruct... existence are generated 18."

Enmity motivated by security will cause extinction, the threats they name aren’t real but are invented by leaders manipulating us.

Mack 1988 (John E., M.D. an American psychiatrist, writer, and professor at Harvard Medical School. He was a Pulitzer Prize-winning biographer. “The Enemy System” 1988.http://www.johnemackinstitute.org/passport/enemysystem.html, MT)

"The threat of... our educational system."

Critical praxis outweighs policy making- voting affirmative guarantees error replication. Only a radical break from dominant paradigms can avoid becoming a self fulfilling prophecy.

Cheeseman and Bruce 1996 (Graeme, Senior Lecturer at the University of New South Wales, and Robert, Associate Professor in social sciences at Curtin university, “Discourses of Danger and Dread Frontiers”, p. 5-8)

"This goal is pursued... them, and why?"

The alternative solves - breaking out of our obsession with security allows alternative relationships to the future - their predictions are ideologically loaded and suspect.

Neocleous 2008 (Mark is a Professor at Brunel University, Critique of Political Economy; Head of Department of Politics and History, he joined Brunel University in the Department of Government in 1994. Since then he has published numerous books and articles. His most recent work has been towards the development of a critique of security. “CRITIQUE OF SECURITY” 2008. Pg. 185-186, MT)

"The only way... return the gift."

It’s impossible to make sense of a political reality absent an interrogation of representations The aff doesn’t get access to plan based offense prior to winning their worldview is productive.

Jourde 2006 (Cedric, Ph.D., Political Science, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, 2002 * M.A., Political Science, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, 1996 * B.Sc., Political Science, Université de Montréal, Montréal, 1995 Hegemony or Empire?: The redefinition of US Power under George W Bush Ed. David and Grondin p. 182-183 2006, MT)

"The next section... with this 'other'."

Tournament:  | Round:  | Opponent:  | Judge:
DADA is unDADA and Truth is unTruth – only accepting DADA can we accept and reject truth
Tzara, 18 (Tristan, “Dada Manifesto 1918,” 1918, twice convicted sexual predator)
"Philosophy is the question... fill the vessel"

WE ARE BOTH AFF AND NEG. WE CHOOSE TO AFFIRM AND NEGATE THE RESOLUTION. We are the only side on your ballot as the aff makes their speech time irrelevant. Looks like your only choice in this round is voting negfirmative
Flake, 19 (Otto, “Thoughts,” 1919, Otto can dance if he wants to, he can leave his friends behind)
"The prerequisite for... are capable of."

THE SECURITIZED LOGIC OF THE 1AC LEADS TO ENDLESS WARFARE. JUST KIDDING ABOUT THAT. TOTALLY NOT TRUE. LOOOUUUUD NOOIIIISES!
COD, 19 (Central Office of Dadaism, “Put Your Money in DADA,” 1919, the COD knows the way of the universe)
"dada is the... money in Dada"

Tournament: Shirley | Round: 1 | Opponent: MSU GT | Judge:
1NC-
Security K
Navy Advantage CP
Schlag- Roleplaying K
Chernus K

2NC-
Chernus K
Security K

1NR-
Schlag

2NR-
Security