General Actions:
# | Date | Entry |
---|---|---|
02/13/2013 | 1NC v Notre DameTournament: UGA | Round: 1 | Opponent: | Judge: 1NC – Topicality Production1.Interpretation - Incentives must be intentionally designed to increase productionAnastos, 8 – RESEARCHER, CROSS GOVERNMENT RESEARCH, POLICY AND PRACTICE BRANCH, OFFICE OF THE CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER, MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND CITIZENS’ SERVICES (Douglas, "DO INCENTIVES WORK? CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT IN ACTIVITIES THROUGH INCENTIVE PROGRAMS", 6/18, http://www.cio.gov.bc.ca/local/cio/kis/pdfs/incentive_programs.pdf-http://www.cio.gov.bc.ca/local/cio/kis/pdfs/incentive_programs.pdf) WHAT ARE INCENTIVES? The term ―incentive,‖ in its modern usage, was conceived in early twentieth century American debates of socialist economics and behavioural psychology. In the original context of industrial relations, psychologists regarded incentives as tools of labour control used in behavioural engineering experiments. Socialist economists adopted the notion that incentives might take the place of profit as a motivator in a planned economy with common ownership, and thereby correct deficiencies of automatic market forces (Grant, 2002). Today, incentives are broadly understood in a range of fields and contexts as devices designed to make one choice more attractive than any other alternative. According to Grant (2002), an incentive is "an offer of something of value, sometimes with a cash equivalent and sometimes not, meant to influence the payoff structure of a utility calculation so as to alter a person’s course of action". (p. 111). Fundamentally, incentives seek to change the status quo by motivating an action that would not occur naturally or automatically. Though incentive programs often take the form of conditional rewards, commonly referred to as the "carrot and stick approach," they differ from rewards in one important way. A reward or punishment, unlike an incentive or disincentive, is merited or deserved. Further, incentives are not synonymous with motivation, in the broad sense of the term, because they fail to account for action that is initiated by the individual or is understood as internally motivated (Grant, 2002). One final distinction, particularly in the corporate sense, is between the concepts of compensation and incentive. The former implies an equalization or redress of a balance, while an incentive is offered as a bonus to motivate one to produce beyond the usual expectation. Incentives, in other words, are intentionally designed to exceed an amount set by market forces. An incentive program is a trust-based arrangement between a provider and a consumer, something that Grant (2002) refers to as a negotiation made in the context of an authority relationship. Obreiter and Nimis (n.d.) comment on some of the common issues and patterns that arise in this relationship: • Roles: In general, the entity distributing the incentive acts as provider, while the recipient or consumer accepts the incentive with the condition of involvement of an activity. In such a situation, the incentive pattern imposes symmetrical roles. • Remuneration: Every incentive program introduces its own type of remuneration with the goal of directing actions. Again, the remuneration scheme is a two-way exchange, as recipients act based on the arrangements of the incentive program. • Trust: Trust and cooperation are essential components of an effective incentive program both for producers and for recipients. Recipients need to know that the program will continue to offer the incentive and producers need to know that participants in the program will follow through with their role in the program once they have received the incentive. • Scalability: Scalability refers to the number of agencies involved in the program as providers and the number of recipients collecting incentives. A large number of agencies involved in the program as providers may complicate implementation. • Implementation issues: A range of implementation issues arise when developing an incentive program. Many of these can be mitigated through attention to the above points. B. Violation – the Aff does not increase incentives for energy production - Courts have acknowledged a separation of ENERGY PRODUCTION and Research and Development.US District Court 99 EVELYN HEINRICH ON BEHALF OF HER HUSBAND GEORGE HEINRICH, HENRY C. Topicality is a Voting IssueGround – the heart of this years topic are the debates over which type of energy is superior AND how the market will achieve that. They skirt this debate by claiming they research nanotech and other crazy things that don’t exist.Limits – there are THOUSANDS of potential restrictions and THOUSANDS of incentive programs – the only way to limit this topic for research is to ensure the negative has a link to energy based disads on SUPPLY not use.Grammatical Precision – the resolution asks the US to reduce restrictions ON energy production – it does not say ITS restrictions meaning they must defend a DECREASE in total number of restrictions.Extra Topicality – At best the affirmative increases the SUPPLY in addition to other elements – this proves the resolution alone is insufficient and provides them with additional solvency ground.Only two types of current Solar Power – Photovoltaic and Solar ThermalWashington 11 (Nikia, "Solar Technology Shatters the Old Glass City", http://blogs.bgsu.edu/blackswampjournal/2011/08/02/solar-technology-shatters-the-old-glass-city/-http://blogs.bgsu.edu/blackswampjournal/2011/08/02/solar-technology-shatters-the-old-glass-city/) What is Solar Energy Solar power, as defined by the United States Environmental Protection Agency-http://www.epa.gov/region1/eco/energy/re_solar.html, is the energy received from the sun to create renewable energy. Two types of solar technologies currently exist in the market: photovoltaic, which collects energy from the sun to provide electricity, and concentrated solar energy (solar thermal), which magnifies the intensity of the sun to create heat. The solar thermal method uses the sun to warm an anti-freeze liquid in tubes called solar thermal collectors. The liquid is then transferred to a heating tank, commonly used for hot water and space heating. The photovoltaic method uses photovoltaic silicon cells, usually linked together to generate maximum power, to collect energy from the sun. A grid gathers the energy from the cells and then converts it to operational electricity. 1NC – Politics DAImmigration reform is moving through the Senate but the specifics still need to be negotiated – Obama’s political capital is keyCBS News 1/28/13 "Key senators agree on sweeping immigration reform" http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57566097/key-senators-agree-on-sweeping-immigration-reform/-http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57566097/key-senators-agree-on-sweeping-immigration-reform/ A bipartisan group of leading senators has reached agreement on the principles of sweeping legislation The plan uniquely disrupts Obama’s ability to pass immigration reform – energy policy derails compromises and its being avoided now.Day 12/27/12 Rob Day is a Partner with Black Coral Capital, based in Boston. He has been a cleantech private equity investor since 2004, and acts or has served as a Director, Observer and advisory board member to multiple companies in the energy tech and related sectors, currently including Digital Lumens, Next Step Living, and Powerit Solutions. "Cleantech Investing: 2013 Predictions" http://www.greentechmedia.com/cleantech-investing/post/cleantech-investing-2013-predictions-http://www.greentechmedia.com/cleantech-investing/post/cleantech-investing-2013-predictions I plan to write up some observations soon from a couple of trips I made Immigration reform is necessary to revive the economy.Ezra Klein 1/31/13 Worried about the economy? Then pass immigration reform http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/01/31/worried-about-the-economy-then-pass-immigration-reform/ Econ decline causes nuclear warMead 9. ~2/4, Walter Russell, Henry A. Kissinger Senior Fellow in U.S. Foreign Policy at the Council on Foreign Relations, Only Makes You Stronger: Why the recession bolstered America, The New Republic~ 1NC – Warming Advantage1. No warming- Newest peer review studies proveTaylor ’11 (7/27- senior fellow for environment policy at the Heartland Institute (2011, "New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole In Global Warming Alarmism," Forbes, http://blogs.forbes.com/jamestaylor/2011/07/27/new-nasa-data-blow-gaping-hold-in-global-warming-alarmism/) NASA satellite data from the years 2000 through 2011 show the Earth’s atmosphere is allowing 2. Negative feedbacks solve- No tipping pointMcShane 8 (Owen, the chairman of the policy panel of the New Zealand Climate Science Coalition and director of the Center for Resource Management Studies, 4-4-8, The National Business Review (New Zealand), "Climate change confirmed but global warming is cancelled", Lexis) Atmospheric scientists generally agree that as carbon dioxide levels increase there is a law of 3. Warming doesn’t cause extinctionLomborg ’8 (Director of the Copenhagen Consensus Center and adjunct professor at the Copenhagen Business School, Bjorn, "Warming warnings get overheated", The Guardian, 8/15, http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/aug/15/carbonemissions.climatechange-http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/aug/15/carbonemissions.climatechange These alarmist predictions are becoming quite bizarre, and could be dismissed as sociological oddities 4. Can’t solve warming – no country will get on boardHale ’11 - PhD Candidate in the Department of Politics at Princeton University and a Visiting Fellow at LSE Global Governance, London School of Economics (Thomas, "A Climate Coalition of the Willing," Washington Quarterly, Winter, http://www.twq.com/11winter/docs/11winter_Hale.pdf Intergovernmental efforts to limit the gases that cause climate change have all but failed. Climate model forecast is revised- EVEN IF warming is real, models show it is not that badhttp://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-20947224-http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-20947224 David Shukman 8 January 2013 The UK Met Office has revised one of its forecasts for how much the world 1NC – Economy Advantage4 things the plan doesn’t do that are necessary to solve NanotechnologyMatthew M. Nordan, Vice President Of Research, Lux Research, Inc, 2005, Hearing, June, http://commdocs.house.gov/committees/science/hsy21950.000/hsy21950_0f.htm What can the U.S. do to maintain and, moreover, extend Research won’t produce new nanotech applicationsJohn Sargent, senior advisor to the Assistant Secretary for Technology Policy, May 15, 2008,Nanotechnology and U.S. Competitiveness, http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/106153.pdf Basic research in nanotechnology may not translate into viable commercial applications. Though no formal Patent bottlenecks block nanotech developmentDr. Raj Bawa, a biochemist and microbiologist, is a registered patent agent licensed to practice before the US Patent and Trademark Office (PTO), 2007, Albany Law Journal of Science %26 Technology, "Nanotechnology Patent Proliferation And The Crisis At The U.S. Patent Office", p. 699-700 Economic decline does not cause War – Studies Prove And Democracies SolveMiller, 2K No Collapse – Empirically DeniedGordon 08 1NC - Nanotech4 things the plan doesn’t do that are necessary to solve NanotechnologyMatthew M. Nordan, Vice President Of Research, Lux Research, Inc, 2005, Hearing, June, http://commdocs.house.gov/committees/science/hsy21950.000/hsy21950_0f.htm What can the U.S. do to maintain and, moreover, extend Research won’t produce new nanotech applicationsJohn Sargent, senior advisor to the Assistant Secretary for Technology Policy, May 15, 2008,Nanotechnology and U.S. Competitiveness, http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/106153.pdf Basic research in nanotechnology may not translate into viable commercial applications. Though no formal Patent bottlenecks block developmentDr. Raj Bawa, a biochemist and microbiologist, is a registered patent agent licensed to practice before the US Patent and Trademark Office (PTO), 2007, Albany Law Journal of Science %26 Technology, "Nanotechnology Patent Proliferation And The Crisis At The U.S. Patent Office", p. 699-700 US decline in nanotech leadership leads to co-op not warLarry Greenemeier, Scientific American, "Heady days of nanotech funding behind it, the U.S. faces big challenges," 8/18/2010, 9http:www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post.cfm?id=heady-days-of-nanotech-funding-behi-2010-08-180 Nanotech arms race is unlikely – development stableJim Logajan Co-director of the MOD Business Newsgroup, 7-6-2004 Squo international arms control will solve nanotech arms races and warsBryan Burns, Ph.D. from Cornell and nanotech scholar, February 13, 2005 | |
02/13/2013 | 1NC v Liberty ThoriumTournament: UGA | Round: | Opponent: | Judge: 1NC – Politics DAImmigration reform is moving through the Senate but the specifics still need to be negotiated – Obama’s political capital is key CBS News 1/28/13 "Key senators agree on sweeping immigration reform" http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57566097/key-senators-agree-on-sweeping-immigration-reform/-http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57566097/key-senators-agree-on-sweeping-immigration-reform/ A bipartisan group of leading senators has reached agreement on the principles of sweeping legislation The plan uniquely disrupts Obama’s ability to pass immigration reform – energy policy derails compromises and its being avoided now. I plan to write up some observations soon from a couple of trips I made Immigration reform is necessary to revive the economy. Econ decline causes nuclear war 1NC – A2 Russia AdvUS- Russia Relations Resilient – Spy Incident Proves Zero Probability of US Russia War – No Military Threat, Dependent on Relations, And Arsenal Restrains Russian transportation of nuclear waste is uniquely dangerous, money meant for safety is stolen by corrupt officials, trains go off the rails, collide and risk dumping into the Baltic. Turn Even if they win that thorium is sage, it still causes reprocessing by other countries – any perception of support for reprocessing will spillover to other tech and builds international expertise. Reprocessing makes meltdowns exponentially worse. Storage of liquid high-level wastes arising from present-day reprocessing technology creates 1NC A2 Waste/Environmental Justice AdvantageThe reductiveness of environmental justice movements precludes a broader effort to end social and racial injustice. They put the cart before the horse – addressing environmental injustice doesn’t solve racism – it has to be the other way around The lack of environmental justice is the result of racism. Racism is so ingrained 1NC A2: Prolif AdvantageThorium doesn’t safeguard the fuel cycle Thorium causes greater proliferation threats in smaller facilities – the alternate process of protactinium eliminates prolif benefits. Naturally-occurring thorium is made up almost entirely of thorium-232, an Protactinium development of thorium Facilitates covert state proliferation Given the need for access to a research or power reactor to irradiate thorium, Nuclear Terrorism is false No theft and no impact Not only does the material’s ~*335~ radioactivity prevent theft, but also its Washington’s miscalculation is not just a product of the difficulties of seeing inside the Hermit the aff can’t solve simply through benign tech transfer—IF economics were the only thing that drove nuclear plant decisions, then obviously there would never be prolif because it’s EXPENSIVE Creating market incentives to discourage the spread of enrichment and reprocessing seems like a reasonable 1NC SolvencyThey can’t solve any advantage the Time Frame is too far off. Their ev is at best hypothetical—there’s a reason the industry isn’t investing. Very long timeframe even with optimal market conditions – an increase in incentives for thorium still won’t get fuel vendors on board. Thorium supporters are conspiratorial and distort the truth. 2NCThorium reactor would give countries a rationale to continue enrichment and reprocessing — can’t control how the technology is used Claims of proliferation resistance are false—thorium reactors produce U-233 which can be used for nukes – trust the IAEA not industry hacks. Threat of international response deters nuclear terror No domino theory—nonproliferation has zero utility Hymans is keenly aware of the deficiency of past proliferation projections, which he attributes 1NC – A2 Meltdowns AdvExperts say the risk of a meltdown is nil – no extinction. Thorium doesn’t burn up waste – it requires conventional reprocessing. |
Tournament | Round | Report |
---|
Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete? |
---|
Air Force
Amherst
Appalachian State
Arizona State
Army
Augustana
Bard
Baylor
Binghamton
Boston College
CSU Northridge
CSU Sacramento
CUNY
Cal Berkeley
Cal Lutheran
Cal Poly SLO
Case Western
Central Florida
Central Oklahoma
Chico
Clarion
Columbia
Concordia
Cornell
Dartmouth
Denver
Drexel-Swarthmore
ENMU
East Los Angeles College
Eastern Washington
Emory
Emporia
Fayetteville State
Florida
Florida Int'l
Florida State
Fordham
Fort Hays
Fresno State
Fullerton
Gainesville State
George Mason
George Washington
Georgetown
Georgia
Georgia State
Georgia Tech
Gonzaga
Harvard
Houston
Idaho State
Illinois
Illinois State
Indiana
Iowa
James Madison
John Carroll
Johns Hopkins
Johnson County CC
KCKCC
Kansas
Kansas State
Kentucky
LA City College
Lafayette
Lewis-Clark State College
Liberty
Lindenwood
Los Rios
Louisiana-Lafayette
Louisville
Loyola
Macalester
Marist
Mary Washington
Mercer
Methodist
Miami FL
Miami OH
Michigan
Michigan State
Minnesota
Mission
Missouri State
NYU
Navy
New School
North Texas
Northern Iowa
Northwestern
Notre Dame
Ohio Wesleyan
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pepperdine
Piedmont
Pittsburgh
Portland State
Princeton
Puget Sound
Redlands
Richmond
Rochester
Rutgers
Samford
San Diego State
San Francisco State
Santa Clara
South Florida St Pete
Southern Methodist
Southwestern
Stanford
Texas State
Texas-Austin
Texas-Dallas
Texas-San Antonio
Texas-Tyler
Towson
Trinity
UCLA
UDC-CC
UMKC
UNLV
USC
Utah
Vanderbilt
Vermont
Virginia Tech
Wake Forest
Washington
Wayne State
Weber
West Georgia
West Virginia
Western Connecticut
Whitman
Wichita State
Wisconsin Oshkosh
Wyoming