Tournament: SFSU Golden Gate Opener | Round: | Opponent: | Judge:
A. The affirmative’s fantasy of control embodies managerial thinking – the notion that we can manage and control the earth’s resources to solve problems conceives of the world as a standing reserve. This process of enframing obliterates all of types of knowledge and locks in calculative thought.
McWhorter, Prof. of Philosophy, ‘9 (U. Richmond, LaDelle, Heidegger and the Earth 2nd Edition, p. vii-viii)
B. the affirmative’s attempt to engage in “resource management” locks us into a fantasy of total control. this ignores the fact that total control is never possible and forgets that the thoughtless deployment of humanist notions of being brought us to the brink of catastrophe in the first place.
McWhorter, Prof. of Philosophy, ‘9 (U of R, LaDelle, Heidegger and the Earth 2nd Edition, p. vii-viii)
C. THE AFFIRMATIVE’S DEPICTION OF THEIR HARMS SERVES TO MAINTAIN CALCULATIVE THOUGHT THROUGH THE DEPLOYMENT OF GUILT OVER THE ENVIRONMENTAL CRISIS
McWhorter, Prof. of Philosophy, ‘9 (U of R, LaDelle, Heidegger and the Earth 2nd Edition, p. vii-viii)
D. The affirmative’s managerial fantasy of total control makes nuclear disaster and environmental collapse inevitable
McWhorter, Prof. of Philosophy, ‘9 (U. Richmond, LaDelle, Heidegger and the Earth 2nd Edition, p. vii-viii)
E. ALTERNATIVE TEXT: Reject Action
We will claim that rejecting action opens up space for reflection on what Heidegger calls “the mystery of Being.”
How is it possible to do nothing in the face of suffering or pending crisis? The urge to do good is deploy engrained in our culture, and hence, the debate community. Heidegger points out that the urge to act is itself what must be thought through, what must be abandoned, to create a new way of Being in the world.
McWhorter, Prof. of Philosophy, ‘9 (U of R, LaDelle, Heidegger and the Earth 2nd Edition, p. vii-viii)
F. The affirmative’s truth claims are suspect - their seemingly predictable policy analysis is trapped in a narrow self reinforcing tunnel vision – their claims that action is the only solution are a product of their ontology and make violence inevitable
Burke 07, (Anthony, ‘Ontologies of War: Violence, Existence and Reason’, Theory and Event, p. Muse, Lecturer in Politics and Int’l Rels at UNSW, Sydney, 2007)
G. Questions of Ontology must be asked and answered first since they inform all relevant knowledge and conceptions of “the problem”
Dillon ‘99 (Michael Dillon, Prof of Politics, University of Lancaster, Moral Spaces, p. 97-98)