General Actions:
# | Date | Entry |
---|---|---|
11/11/2012 | T ProcurementTournament: Wake | Round: 5 | Opponent: | Judge:
A. Incentives motivate a change in action. The plan doesn’t incentivize action beyond the purchase of the solar generators, which are already being made. B. This is not like military procurement of reactors which spurs further development of nuclear power. This is they just buy some solar. There is no incentive for doing more. Procurement's not an incentive 2. Their interpretation is bad- A. Bidirectionality – they can claim to buy all the solar industry to kill it. B. Limits – Guaranteed purchase legitimizes cases like RPS or feed-in-tariffs. Explodes the mechanism of an already huge topic. 3. T is a voter because it’s necessary for debate | |
11/11/2012 | Death CultTournament: Wake | Round: 5 | Opponent: | Judge:
A) Trivialization. Death debating causes an aesthetic fascination with the spectacle of death. This turns debate into a death cult and denies the choice to avoid death impacts. B) Body Counts. Death debating reduces peoples’ lives to mere numbers for debaters to consume in their game. 2. Vote neg because the aff introduced death impacts into the debate. 3. This is a gateway argument about how we should be allowed to debate. If they win that we can use death impacts, then the rest of the 1NC applies. We will not make cross-applications from other flows to prove the link. | |
11/11/2012 | Politics DA (Fiscal Cliff)Tournament: Wake | Round: 5 | Opponent: | Judge: Even secret military alternative energy is unpopular in congress – spending concerns, Solyndra controversy and perceived as politically motivated Sequestration devastates military capabilities – guarantees conflict escalation and terrorism Kagan | |
11/11/2012 | Rare Earth DATournament: Wake | Round: 5 | Opponent: | Judge: Sudden energy investment skyrockets rare earth prices – devastates manufacturers and deters innovation across all industries. China will respond by cutting off rare earth supply – culminates in U.S.-China war. Extinction. | |
11/11/2012 | Case-Econ (v Solar-grid)Tournament: Wake | Round: 5 | Opponent: | Judge: Business in resilient – they can offset losses; for example producing and selling more after the blackout Repairs after blackouts are an economic stimulus Economic decline doesn’t cause war. Widespread blackouts won't happen here | |
01/04/2013 | Blackouts DATournament: USC | Round: | Opponent: | Judge: B. Impacts
2. Economic downturn causes wars – history proves 3. Sudden decline in US military capability causes global war 4. These conflicts escalate to nuclear war | |
01/04/2013 | Introna KTournament: | Round: | Opponent: | Judge: It is important to highlight the way performativity's …….. “rogue states” see Blum, 2002 and Litwak, 2000). The affirmative’s willingness to draw lines at all is groundless and results in extinction. In the first, more traditional sense, I mean the values and ………. for being itself becomes concealed. Our alternative is to embrace the absolute otherness of every other – this is the only moral imperative and is critical to rupture violence. The inevitable termination of all matter and the unique position of life as a being that chooses makes the ethical alignment of the alternative the only impact you evaluate. In this way, desire or love is becoming, and generosity is generativity - ………….. turning away has a defining quality. If not us, then who? | |
01/04/2013 | Iran DATournament: | Round: | Opponent: | Judge: A. Lack of US prolif leadership undermines sanctions on Iran – others won't go along and that nullified the sanctions B. US leadership would mean complete, international sanctions against Iran C. US leadership would result effective sanctions and risk Iran lash out D. The result is extinction | |
02/12/2013 | Buddhism KTournament: | Round: | Opponent: | Judge: The alternative is to move beyond dualisms and reject the concept of the self. | |
02/12/2013 | Heating Fuel Subsidies CPTournament: | Round: | Opponent: | Judge: Counterplan solves and resolves ethics. | |
02/12/2013 | China Coal DATournament: | Round: | Opponent: | Judge: US shift away from coal multiplies exports to China tenfold US coal exports drive Chinese coal demand – domestic production can’t keep pace Cheap coal leads to runaway warming – it locks in Chinese coal dependence for the next half century Pollution causes CCP collapse and nuclear war | |
02/12/2013 | T Energy ProductionTournament: | Round: | Opponent: | Judge: "on" means production must be the object of incentives Energy production is transforming natural resources to heat, light or electricity Violation – The aff is not tied to energy production. GHG restriction might affect energy production, but itself is not energy reduction. Vote neg Limits – tons of bidirectional mechanisms impact energy technology in ways that could increase or decrease production – only directly lifting restriction on increased production creates fair, predictable limits Unpredictable ground – They can claim advantages off of mechanisms that affect energy production. They can claim research benefits off of RandD affs, they can claim warming advantages off of clean coal, etc. FX and Extra T is a voter –Proves the resolution is insufficient, and it’s inherently de-limiting. | |
03/29/2013 | NDT Round 1 - vs Iowa CKTournament: | Round: | Opponent: | Judge: A.Financial incentives exclude coercive action 1.Financial incentives are positive –they only rely on economic reward 2.Financial incentives are different from regulations and policies B. Plan violates – the feed-in tariff is based on a coercive action, the requirement to buy. Without that requirement, not one would pay the higher price. An incentive structure might be created, but it is based on the requirement to purchase at a particular price Limits are necessary for negative preparation and clash. Permitting new requirments makes the topic bi-directional – even if the requirement forces an incentive structure on the market, it increases restrictions to begin with Also, permitting new regulations as the basis for incentives is unlimiting – there's no limit to the number of new requirements that could be imposed on energy production T is a voter because it is necessary for debate. Immigration DA Immigration reform has momentum and it’s Obamas top priority, PC is key Plan costs PC-- Feed-in tarrifs are massively unpopular Immigration reforms key to the economy Extinction States CP States can do feed-in tariffs Rare Earth DA Short term energy investment skyrockets rare earth prices – devastates manufacturers and deters innovation across all industries. China will respond by cutting off rare earth supply – collapses relations Extinction. Neoliberalism K Multiple structural trends towards extinction Our alternative is to reject the Aff’s endorsement of market mechanisms. Our rejection of market competition is an act of economic imagination that can create real alternatives within the existing economy Warming Turn-- Feed in tariff doesn’t decrease emissions – It results in small-scale projects that tradeoff with real solutions Their solvency evidence assumes EVERY OTHER EMISSIONS POLICY IN THE WORLD IS 100% successful We're past the tipping point – scientific consensus Alt causes – Deforestation. Meta-analysis of ocean acidification finds little damage because of adaptation and community resilience – Their studies are snapshots No global tech transfer – trade barriers prevent adoption Grid No cyber war – deterrence. Monoculture doesn’t cause crop extinctions – no impact. No impact – agroterrorism is ineffective and on a small scale. No reason big farms couldn’t also cash in on Feed in Tariffs – their 1ac internal lx is terrible. Doesn’t correct any structural factors Barriers like state laws prevent changes in the grid – renewables would feed into the existing grid Disregard their Corsi evidence – he’s an unqualified, bigoted conspiracy theorist whose writing has not been peer-reviewed and should be considered presumptively false. Water EU improving food aid—US exports not key. Food shocks inevitable – too many alt causes. Can’t solve – political reforms are a prerequisite. Wars don’t escalate—only poor countries with weak militaries would go to war over food Ogallala depletion inevitable No Ogallala depletion |
Tournament | Round | Report |
---|
Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete? |
---|---|---|---|
09/28/2012 | |||
11/10/2012 |
Air Force
Amherst
Appalachian State
Arizona State
Army
Augustana
Bard
Baylor
Binghamton
Boston College
CSU Northridge
CSU Sacramento
CUNY
Cal Berkeley
Cal Lutheran
Cal Poly SLO
Case Western
Central Florida
Central Oklahoma
Chico
Clarion
Columbia
Concordia
Cornell
Dartmouth
Denver
Drexel-Swarthmore
ENMU
East Los Angeles College
Eastern Washington
Emory
Emporia
Fayetteville State
Florida
Florida Int'l
Florida State
Fordham
Fort Hays
Fresno State
Fullerton
Gainesville State
George Mason
George Washington
Georgetown
Georgia
Georgia State
Georgia Tech
Gonzaga
Harvard
Houston
Idaho State
Illinois
Illinois State
Indiana
Iowa
James Madison
John Carroll
Johns Hopkins
Johnson County CC
KCKCC
Kansas
Kansas State
Kentucky
LA City College
Lafayette
Lewis-Clark State College
Liberty
Lindenwood
Los Rios
Louisiana-Lafayette
Louisville
Loyola
Macalester
Marist
Mary Washington
Mercer
Methodist
Miami FL
Miami OH
Michigan
Michigan State
Minnesota
Mission
Missouri State
NYU
Navy
New School
North Texas
Northern Iowa
Northwestern
Notre Dame
Ohio Wesleyan
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pepperdine
Piedmont
Pittsburgh
Portland State
Princeton
Puget Sound
Redlands
Richmond
Rochester
Rutgers
Samford
San Diego State
San Francisco State
Santa Clara
South Florida St Pete
Southern Methodist
Southwestern
Stanford
Texas State
Texas-Austin
Texas-Dallas
Texas-San Antonio
Texas-Tyler
Towson
Trinity
UCLA
UDC-CC
UMKC
UNLV
USC
Utah
Vanderbilt
Vermont
Virginia Tech
Wake Forest
Washington
Wayne State
Weber
West Georgia
West Virginia
Western Connecticut
Whitman
Wichita State
Wisconsin Oshkosh
Wyoming