Tournament: Cali Swing | Round: | Opponent: | Judge:
Solar 1AC
“Van Gogh began to give to the sun a meaning which it had not yet had. He did not introduce it into his canvases as part of a décor, but rather like the sorcerer whose dance slowly rouses the crowd, transporting it in its movement. At that moment all of his painting finally became radiation, explosion, flame, and himself, lost in ecstasy before a source of radiant life, exploding, inflamed.”
[Bataille & Michelson 86 [Georges & Annette (Prof of Cinema Studies), “Van Gogh as Prometheus,” October 36, 58-60, http://www.jstor.org/stable/778550]
Van Gogh’s solar radiation invites a different approach to this year’s resolution. Debates have been constrained by a limited understanding of the world that ignores that there are two suns. One view elevates the sun to be the ultimate source of truth and energy. The second sun, rotten with glory and waste is eclipsed by the drive to make the world useful. Van Gogh’s act of auto-mutilation is a production of an other solar energy, energy other to the economy of productivity and utility.
Jay 94 [Martin, Prof of History at UC Berkeley, “The Disenchantment of the Eye,” ed. Lucien Taylor, Visualizing Theory: Selected Essays from V.A.R. 1990-1994, p.178-9]
No less subversive of traditional
AND
conflicting meanings for Bataille.
Van Gogh’s sacrifice occurred along a solar trajectory as apart of the general economy – he lived like a sun. It was a production of solar energy through waste and ecstasy. The sun serves as the basis for life and, in turn, the ability to expend energy. Life is an effect of the sun squandering upon us without return: a unilateral, excessive, and wasteful burning.
Land 92 [Nick, Lecturer in Continental Philosophy at Warwick, The Thirst for Annihilation, p. 22-23]
All human endeavour
AND
excess must, in the end, be spent.
The affirmation of solar expenditure challenges the modern economy built on the destruction of nature for the production of comfort. A traditional interpretation of the resolution would ask us to build more solar panels or power the gird. This stockpiling of resources is inseparable from a modern subjectivity that desires stability and wholeness. The depersonalization of the experience of consumption renders intimate expenditure impossible.
Stoekl 07 [Allan, Prof of Comp Lit at Penn State, Bataille’s Peak: Energy, Religion, and Postsustainability, p.138-140]
Thus Bataille’s affirmation
AND
remain in thrall to the self as ultimate signified.
Energy derived from fossil fuels is profoundly different from the energy affirmed by the affirmative. Solar energy pulses through the body, causing anguish and intimacy. For it is the lack of intimacy that contributes to the stockpiling of the standing reserve and the indifferent depletion of energy. Modern warfare reflects this lack of intimacy – war reduced to a calculation of use value
Stoekl 07 [Allan, Prof of Comp Lit at Penn State, Bataille’s Peak: Energy, Religion, and Postsustainability, p. 56-7]
Just as there are two energetic
AND
and through death, have disappeared.
Just as the sun is doubled, so too is the figure of the United States federal government. The flesh of the condemned marks the inverted double of the sovereign power of the state. Our flesh is the beautiful and rotten excess produced through the relentless drive for production, but it therefore also marks the point at which sovereignty can be reappropriated.
We, the flesh of the United States federal government, are capable of reasserting the excessive enjoyment of life through sacrifice. We, the flesh of the United States federal government, should gloriously sacrifice our flesh to live like suns.
Hansen & Stepputat 05 [Thomas (Prof of Anthropology) & Finn (Senior Researcher at the Danish Institute for International Studies), Sovereign Bodies: Citizens, Migrants, and States in the Postcolonial World, http://press.princeton.edu/chapters/i7996.html]
It was Foucault's Discipline and Punish:
AND
extraordinary actions and moments.
The destruction of otherness is the aftereffect of sovereignty connected to absolutism. We must destroy these ‘Gods’ of understandings of the world through the sacrifice of our flesh. This anguish causes fleeting moments of communication between us.
Jeremy Biles 24 Nov 2011 PhD from the University of Chicago Divinity School “The Remains of God: Batailie/ Sacrifice/ Community” Found in Culture, Theory and Critique 52:2-3 on 141
It is true that Bataille
AND
wound communication takes place.
Traditional pedagogies’ disregard the intimate connection between energy and the body. This has paved the way for the massacre of ecosystems and war. War becomes an exertion of excess in a hollow and catastrophic way.
Sirc in 1996 (Geoffrey, Ph.D.: Composition Theory, University of Minnesota, “Godless Composition, Tormented Writing”, http://jaconlinejournal.com/archives/vol15.3/sirc-godless.pdf,)
Composition's notion of
AND
of the possible.
To think the possibility of a solar community requires rethinking the very notion of community itself. It is to live out the incessant sacrifice of the God of security and oneness. It is to enter into an intimate act of communication with others that refuses the drive for external authorization – a union without unity. To live like suns, we must relinquish control.
Biles 11 [Jeremy, Instructor in Religion, Philosophy & Art, “The Remains of God,” Culture, Theory and Critique 52.2-3, p. 141-3]
It is reason elevated
AND
of God, at the end of eternity.
Refuse debate’s traditional curriculum. Its hatred of chance enslaves us to catastrophic expenditure. The sacrificial pedagogy of the affirmative embraces the rupture life and opens spaces for desire.
Sirc in 1996 (Geoffrey, Ph.D.: Composition Theory, University of Minnesota, “Godless Composition, Tormented Writing”, http://jaconlinejournal.com/archives/vol15.3/sirc-godless.pdf, )
What Lingis feels in his
AND
a certain amount of control over that.