Tournament:  | Round:  | Opponent:  | Judge: 

Tournament:  | Round:  | Opponent:  | Judge: 

Energy consumption represents the peak of our manipulation of the environment. Rather than revealing the ontological beauty of nature, it stores it for human utilization. This is the pinnacle of standing reserve logic that obviates our relation to the power of the Earth.

Beckman, Emeritus Professor of Philosophy, 2000 Tad, Harvey Mudd College, Martin Heidegger and Environnmental Ethics, page @ http://www2.hmc.edu/~tbeckman/personal/HEIDART.HTML

AND 

The discourse of environmental apocalypse is proven to cause rash ineffective decision making that only ever exacerbates the situation being described. Only replacing this urge to DO with and urge to THINK can prevent the looming catastrophe.

McWhorter, Professor of Philosophy and Women's Studies Department of Philosophy University of Richmond, 92 LaDelle, Heidegger and the Earth: Essays in Environmental Ethics, page (check page #)

AND

The ontological crisis of modern enframing renders all being expendable. All acts of destruction are not events in themselves but merely signs of a new age defined by technological comportment. In an un-world of standing reserve

Milchman and Rosenberg ,1996 (Alan, Professor of Political Science at Queens College CUNY,  Alan, Assistant professor at Queens College CUNY, “Heidegger, Planetary Technics, Holocaust” Martin Heidegger and the Holocaust p.  225-226)

AND

Ontological damnation outweighs nuclear war

Zimmerman, 97 Michael, Contesting Earth's Future: Radical Ecology and Postmodernity, Berkeley, Calif. University of California Press, 1997. p.119-120

AND

Rather than impose our image of reality upon the world we should let the Earth disclose itself to us, singing words of wisdom, let it be.

Padrutt, member of the Daseinsanalytisches Intitut in Zurich, 92 Hanspete, Heidegger and the Earth: Essays in Environmental Ethics, Edited by Ladelle Mcwhorter, Chapter 2: Heidegger and Ecology, page 17-19 

AND

Ontology comes first- it’s the starting point for all political considerations

Dillon, Prof of Politics- University of Lancaster, 99 Michael, Moral Spaces p. 97-98

Tournament:  | Round:  | Opponent:  | Judge: 

Preventing the ecological crisis by means of regulation ensures that environmental logic will become internalized, demonizing anyone who does not live in the most austere manner imaginable, an environmentalist police state.

Luke March 1997 (Timothy W. Department of Political Science Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Blacksburg, VA “The (Un)Wise (Ab)Use of Nature: Environmentalism as Globalized Consumerism?” http:~/~/www.cddc.vt.edu/tim/tims/htm(%%) 

AND

The use of incentives to private industries is the ideal link. The tactical investment of government funds is used to solidify the ideal state of consmerism and display the economic firepower of the sovereign state. Even environmentalist resistance can be rearticulated as a justification for more efficient techniques of resource extraction.

Luke March 1997 (Timothy W. Department of Political Science Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Blacksburg, VA “The (Un)Wise (Ab)Use of Nature: Environmentalism as Globalized Consumerism?” http://www.cddc.vt.edu/tim/tims/Tim528.htm) 

AND

The affirmative has failed to problematize the lack of a stable rational subject behind the plan, which guarantees fascism by ignoring the questions of subjectivity.  We should stop asking what to do, and start asking how we got here.

Pierre Schlag, professor of law at the University of Colorado, “Normativity and the Politics of Forum,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review, April 1991, jstor

AND

Biopolitical attitudes have been responsible for the most violent wars in human history—extermination and extinction become justified in the name of destroying anything that becomes identified as a threat to the health of the overall population.

Mitchell Dean, professor of sociology at Macquarie University in Australia, 2001, “Sovereignty and Biopolitics in Nonliberal Rule,” States of Imagination edited by Thomas Hansen and Finn Stepputat, pg. 41-64. 

AND

Our alternative is to reproblematize the 1ac and criticize the justifications for their case. The aff has developed their plan as a response to various assumptions they’ve made about the world—they chose a plan and organized reality to appear as calling for this solution. This is backwards—before deciding to act, we must confront the accuracy of the problem they have created. We are criticizing the way the aff attaches the plan and its justifications, the method of problematization they’ve used.

Michel Foucault, professor of histories of systems of thought at the College of France, Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth, “Polemics, Politics, and Problematizations,” 1997, pg. 117-119

AND

The affirmative’s refusal to engage the underlying epistemology behind their assumptions dooms their project to serial policy failure.

Michael Dillon, professor of political science at Lancaster and Julian Reid, lecturer on international relations and professor of political science at King’s College in London; 2000, Alternatives, Volume 25, Issue 1: Global Governance, Liberal Peace, and Complex Emergency

Tournament:  | Round:  | Opponent:  | Judge: 

The affirmative paints a picture of international relations that operates on a simple causal basis. If x then y. This illusion of causality is simply a security blanket for an inherently disordered world. The craving for order and certainty is inherently violent. Proliferation is a single instance of a myriad of existential threats that plague international relations. The deployment of nuclear weapons is the finality of a dangerous technologization that will forever contain and exploit - but never resolve - conflict

Burke ‘7 /Anthony, Senior Lecturer in Politics and International Relations at UNSW, Sydney, Ontologies of War: Violence, Existence and Reason, Theory and Event Volume 10 Issue 2, Muse/

AND

Donald Rumsfeld sophisticatedly outlined U.S. foreign policy by declaring that we must preemptively strike the “unknown unknowns” - the ubiquitous and unintelligible enemies that are perceived as existential challenges, whether in fact or potential. In response American aims become threat-generating. The attempt to provide order and control becomes the endless madness of preemptive warfare.

Massumi ‘7 /Brian, “Potential Politics and the Primacy of Preemption,” Theory and Event 10.2, Muse/

AND

Fear is the motivating factor of status quo politics. We no longer seek a world of predictability and order, but instead embrace disorder and vulnerability. There are no enemies, and especially no potential enemies, and thus no scapegoats. Rather than renouncing uncertainty, we overcome it, opening up space for a truly radical politics

Lavin ‘6 /Chad, political theory at Tulane, “Fear, radical democracy, and ontological methadone,” Polity 38.2, April/

AND

The debate space is key! Investigating our framing of and relation to nuclear imagery and international politics if we are to make political changes. This is an independent criticism as well as solvency for the alternative. Nuclear exchange is inevitable as long as militaristic and economically driven forces control the symbolism of the nuke. Only voting negative solves this and the violent rationality of the affirmative.

Taylor ‘3 /Bryan C, Prof Communications University Colorado at Boulder, “Our Bruised Arms Hung Up as  Monuments: Nuclear Iconography in  Post-Cold War Culture,” Critical Studies in Media Communication 20.1, March/

Tournament:  | Round:  | Opponent:  | Judge: 

WE CHOOSE TO USE THE 1AC AS A STARTING POINT FOR COMPASSION AND THE EXPRESSION OF SHARED FEELINGS WHILE ALSO HIGHLIGHTING THE DIFFERENCES THAT EXIST WITHIN AND BETWEEN OUR INDIVIDUAL LIFE EXPERIENCES.  THIS SHARED EMOTIONALITY IS THE BEST WAY TO SPUR DELIBERATIVE DISCOURSE, CREATE SOCIAL ACTION, AND EMPIRICALLY WORKS TO ENABLE EXAMINATION OF THE “PARADOX OF PRIVILEGE”

KIRSTIE FLECKENSTEIN 2007

http:~/~/jaconlinejournal.com/archives/vol27.3-4/pdf