General Actions:
# | Date | Entry |
---|---|---|
09/17/2012 | Defense Conversion AFF (MIC + Grid)Tournament: UNI | Round: 1 | Opponent: Washington-St. Louis FS | Judge: David Cram Helwich Contention One – the Military Industrial Complex Mass subsidization of defense contracting blocks sustainable energy from coming online. This breeds economic dependence on war while funneling industrial development into unending military accumulation.
Ever increasing defense contracts are justified by the institutionalization of threat inflation. Mass military spending has become the norm as new threats build a mutually dependent relationship between the national security state and neoconservative hawks.
The mere availability of weapons creates a constant preparation for war that is the primary source of global conflict.
Weapons manufacturing hypnotizes us into a sense of fear and panic that demands silence to ensure its survival – the products created by this system are the greatest source of terror and violence in recorded history, responsible for more deaths in the past 50 years than the past two thousand combined.
Contention Two – Blackouts Grid vulnerability is high now due to band-aidsolutions that rely on fossil fuels – failure is inevitable, collapsing civilization. Innovative financing for distributed generation is the only way to reduce the risk of blackouts.
Blackouts risk hundreds of nuclear meltdowns across the country.
Grid instability results in accidents worse than nuclear war.
Renewable sources are already facing supply side constraints – Demand will continue to grow as rising consumption faces inadequate availability of fossil fuels. Now is the key time to create proactive financial incentives for the global transition to renewable alternatives.
Distributed generation creates storage solutions that provide stable sources of power capable of overcoming concerns of intermittency.
Thus the Plan:
Contention Two – Defense Conversion Redirecting defense spending towards solar and wind development eliminates the self-justifying nature of the military industrial complex.
Incentives for defense conversion to alternative energy contains the power of the military-industrial complex – defense contractors are ready and willing to make the shift if the federal government articulates a clear vision for change.
Funding for U.S. military procurement contracts should be reallocated tax incentives for defense conversion to renewable energy. Federal action is necessary and will set the global agenda toward transitioning to renewable energy.
US action is key – we structure other nations’ defense budgeting decisions.
Defense conversion offers a political alternative to militarism, fossil fuel dependency and war by creating a utopian form of realism based upon transformation of the permanent war society.
European conversion proves – the plan is a both reorientation of defense hardware and a restructuring of values at the individual, national and international level.
The transition to defense conversion won’t cause an attack on the US or extinction – however, the permanent war making machine could end all human life. Its try or die for the affirmative. | |
01/30/2013 | Def Con AFF - Indiana 1ACTournament: | Round: | Opponent: | Judge: PLAN The United States federal government should substantially increase financial incentives for the production of solar and wind power in the United States by converted domestic defense contractors. Contention One – the Military Industrial Complex Mass subsidization of defense contracting blocks sustainable energy from coming online. This breeds economic dependence on war while funneling industrial development into unending military accumulation. Ever increasing defense contracts are justified by the institutionalization of threat inflation. Mass military spending has become the norm as new threats build a mutually dependent relationship between the national security state and neoconservative hawks. The mere availability of weapons creates a constant preparation for war that is the primary source of global conflict. Weapons manufacturing hypnotizes us into a sense of fear and panic that demands silence to ensure its survival – the products created by this system are the greatest source of terror and violence in recorded history, responsible for more deaths in the past 50 years than the past two thousand combined. Contention Two – Climate Ethics Scientists agree – warming is real and human induced. Positive feedbacks will only accelerate warming, creating major flows of environmental refugees. Warming induced sea level rise will leave the world’s poorest groups adversely affected with no means of adaptation. Warming also guarantees massive species extinction. Mourning the extinction of any creature in the odyssey of evolution enables humans to become co-passengers on the ship where we live and let live and wonder in the magnitude and duration of the biotic community. Ethical responsibility means transcendence of anthropocentrism and the domination and denial of nonhuman subjectivity. Anthropocentrism causes extinction—it divorces our relationship with the natural world and makes ecocide inevitable. We are ethically obligated to act even in the face of consequentialist or utilitarian demands – our action can’t be contingent on the actions of others but rather should serve as the starting point for setting an example for others to follow. You should take a geologic sense of time – our ecological footprint last for hundreds of years while the planet's regulatory system works at glacial speeds. Acting now is critical to slowing the rate of climate change and giving the planet a chance for adaptation – delays magnify the impact. Doing nothing is not an option. Contention Three – Defense Conversion Redirecting defense spending towards solar and wind development eliminates the self-justifying nature of the military industrial complex. Incentives for defense conversion to alternative energy contains the power of the military-industrial complex – defense contractors are ready and willing to make the shift if the federal government articulates a clear vision for change. Funding for U.S. military procurement contracts should be reallocated tax incentives for defense conversion to renewable energy. Federal action is necessary and will set the global agenda toward transitioning to renewable energy. Defense conversion is the key response to climate change – incentives will work to prevent job loss and smooth the transition. US action is key – we structure other nations’ defense budgeting decisions. Defense conversion offers a political alternative to militarism, fossil fuel dependency and war by creating a utopian form of realism based upon transformation of the permanent war society. European conversion proves – the plan is a both reorientation of defense hardware and a restructuring of values at the individual, national and international level. | |
03/16/2013 | Def Con AFF - 1AC (MIC + Climate)Tournament: NJDDT | Round: 4 | Opponent: UCO BD | Judge: Chase Contention One – the Military Industrial Complex Mass subsidization of defense contracting blocks sustainable energy from coming online. This breeds economic dependence on war while funneling industrial development into unending military accumulation. Ever increasing defense contracts are justified by the institutionalization of threat inflation. Mass military spending has become the norm as new threats build a mutually dependent relationship between the national security state and neoconservative hawks. The mere availability of weapons creates a constant preparation for war that is the primary source of global conflict. Weapons manufacturing hypnotizes us into a sense of fear and panic that demands silence to ensure its survival – the products created by this system are the greatest source of terror and violence in recorded history, responsible for more deaths in the past 50 years than the past two thousand combined. US military industrial complex produces an armaments culture linked to white supremacy, heterosexism and hegemonic masculinity making violence an everyday practice of real life. Oppressions are interlocking and support the system of power that makes nuclear war inevitable. Contention Two – Climate Ethics Scientists agree – warming is real and human induced. Warming guarantees massive species extinction. Mourning the extinction of any creature in the odyssey of evolution enables humans to become co-passengers on the ship where we live and let live and wonder in the magnitude and duration of the biotic community. Ethical responsibility means transcendence of anthropocentrism and the domination and denial of nonhuman subjectivity. Anthropocentrism causes extinction—it divorces our relationship with the natural world and makes ecocide inevitable. Now is a unique moment for discussing climate change – anti-science ideology is on the rise – it is generating skepticism toward global warming that precludes institutional change. There is an ethical obligation to reject climate denialism – failure to do so banishes millions to a fate of endless suffering. Contention Three – Defense Conversion Redirecting defense spending towards solar and wind development eliminates the self-justifying nature of the military industrial complex. Incentives for defense conversion to alternative energy contains the power of the military-industrial complex – defense contractors are ready and willing to make the shift if the federal government articulates a clear vision for change. Funding for U.S. military procurement contracts should be reallocated tax incentives for defense conversion to renewable energy. Federal action is necessary and will set the global agenda toward transitioning to renewable energy. Defense conversion is the key response to climate denialism – incentives will work to prevent job loss and smooth the transition. US action is key – we structure other nations’ defense budgeting decisions. Defense conversion offers a political alternative to militarism, fossil fuel dependency and war by creating a utopian form of realism based upon transformation of the permanent war society. European conversion proves – the plan is a both reorientation of defense hardware and a restructuring of values at the individual, national and international level. |
Tournament | Round | Report |
---|
Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete? |
---|
Air Force
Amherst
Appalachian State
Arizona State
Army
Augustana
Bard
Baylor
Binghamton
Boston College
CSU Northridge
CSU Sacramento
CUNY
Cal Berkeley
Cal Lutheran
Cal Poly SLO
Case Western
Central Florida
Central Oklahoma
Chico
Clarion
Columbia
Concordia
Cornell
Dartmouth
Denver
Drexel-Swarthmore
ENMU
East Los Angeles College
Eastern Washington
Emory
Emporia
Fayetteville State
Florida
Florida Int'l
Florida State
Fordham
Fort Hays
Fresno State
Fullerton
Gainesville State
George Mason
George Washington
Georgetown
Georgia
Georgia State
Georgia Tech
Gonzaga
Harvard
Houston
Idaho State
Illinois
Illinois State
Indiana
Iowa
James Madison
John Carroll
Johns Hopkins
Johnson County CC
KCKCC
Kansas
Kansas State
Kentucky
LA City College
Lafayette
Lewis-Clark State College
Liberty
Lindenwood
Los Rios
Louisiana-Lafayette
Louisville
Loyola
Macalester
Marist
Mary Washington
Mercer
Methodist
Miami FL
Miami OH
Michigan
Michigan State
Minnesota
Mission
Missouri State
NYU
Navy
New School
North Texas
Northern Iowa
Northwestern
Notre Dame
Ohio Wesleyan
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pepperdine
Piedmont
Pittsburgh
Portland State
Princeton
Puget Sound
Redlands
Richmond
Rochester
Rutgers
Samford
San Diego State
San Francisco State
Santa Clara
South Florida St Pete
Southern Methodist
Southwestern
Stanford
Texas State
Texas-Austin
Texas-Dallas
Texas-San Antonio
Texas-Tyler
Towson
Trinity
UCLA
UDC-CC
UMKC
UNLV
USC
Utah
Vanderbilt
Vermont
Virginia Tech
Wake Forest
Washington
Wayne State
Weber
West Georgia
West Virginia
Western Connecticut
Whitman
Wichita State
Wisconsin Oshkosh
Wyoming